User talk:66.249.202.99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi 66.249.202.99. In response to your enquiry about the article glans, yes, I do think the photos are apppropriate, given the subject matter. Articles in Wikipedia are not censored, and photos appropriate to the subject matter are allowed. If you want more info, jsut let me know. Esseh 12:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think that's awesome. Even though I wouldn't expect this article to appear as a featured article on the main page. I was reading the article about Lloyd Kaufman when I clicked on a link there that took me to the glans article, so I am not particularly offended by this type of thing. I think a nicely pencil drawn penis would be better in the long run, specially if wikipedia hopes to be published as a book someday. If not, hey man, go crazy with the cheez whiz.66.249.202.99

[edit] OK...

Good to hear from you. I have no idea where a link to glans would be found in Lloyd Kaufman? Curious. The glans article is meant as an informative medically/anatomically related article, hence the need for images. Line drawings are good for some purposes, but somehow a photo is often more informative. Just my opinion. Just for comparison, you can check out other articles in the area. All the best. Esseh 22:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

It's in the part where he (Lloyd) says he got dengue fever and thought his penis had eyes. Read it man, it's awesome and it's not vandalism. And as I told you, it's awesome that penises can be shown freely over the Internet as well as vaginas. I also think it's a very pretty pink penis too. Very cute.66.249.202.99
OK, will check that. Sounds like a real bad trip to me. My "trouser snake" only has one eye ;) As for the penis... well, it's not mine, but honestly, they all look pretty much the same. If I need one to point (ooooh, bad word) something out, I'll use it, but won't go out of my way. Oh, and anatomically, they're "vulvae", not vaginas. Just FYI. Al the best Esseh 03:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Ah, OK. "head of his penis" should go to glans penis, to be specific. Bet you'll see a pretty pink one there, too. (OH, I'll correct the link now, too.) Esseh 03:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Susan Sontag (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 03:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 03:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Susan Sontag, you will be blocked from editing. —Celithemis 03:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. - Alison☺ 03:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)