User talk:66.235.44.73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Judging by your many edits, they are worthy, but you offer no sources or links and make it piont of view POV. You also add the links in talics.Not Matching article format style and only adding an opinion that should be kept to the discussion page. If you could find a source to back up what you are saying, they would all be worthy additions , if not, they will all be edited out! Ciriii 20:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

THIS IS BIASED


Biased in favour of who / what, do tell??

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New York Times article

You might be interested to know that, according to this New York Times article, your insertion of unsourced, apparently incorrect information in the Shimabara Rebellion article caused a college in Vermont to ban citations to Wikipedia! Grover cleveland 15:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I just came by to say the same thing. What are your sources? - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 18:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)