User talk:66.118.242.7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Cheese on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. DrunkenSmurf 03:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Shuriken. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Studerby 05:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Beauty. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 20:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --TeaDrinker 06:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hugh Jackman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 06:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gackt, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gackt was changed by 66.118.242.7 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-15T09:27:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 09:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — OcatecirT 09:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is a shared IP, and I cannot retrieve my password and log into my account. Please unblock, other people from the IP have been causing trouble

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --SilentAria talk 20:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gackt was changed by 66.118.242.7 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-19T07:26:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt, you will be blocked from editing. --SilentAria talk 08:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gackt has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 06:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Gackt constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 07:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC))

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Spebi 08:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

unblock|This is an IP shared by an entire college dorm. Please unblock.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 06:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Oxymoron83, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 06:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 07:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi Miyavi

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gackt, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gackt was changed by 66.118.242.7 (c) (t) deleting 7941 characters on 2007-12-03T08:59:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 08:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Gackt, you will be blocked from editing. --SilentAria talk 10:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

{{anonblock}}

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- - auburnpilot talk 19:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP belongs to a college dorm. Please unblock us, we're not all editing Gackt's page."

Decline reason: "Unfortunately, there is too much vandalism coming from this college dorm to leave it unblocked. Those users who are not vandals should still be able to edit using user accounts, but the vandalism has made it necessary to block anonymous editing form this IP. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Trouble is, neither the WHOIS data (which does not mention anything about a college), nor the contribution history of this IP (which appears to me to indicate the IP is being used by only one person, for a prolonged period of time) seem to support that claim. However, if you contact the unblock-en-l mailing list using a college-issued email address, that might be a piece of evidence in your favor -- if you go that route, be sure to reference this page's URL in your email. In the event this address is actually shared, please accept my apologies for any inconvenience caused by the block. In the meantime, I'm leaving this request up for review by another administrator. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
In my decline, I worked from the assumption that this user is telling the truth. However, I agree with you that the edit history is more consistent with a single user than with a lot of people using the same IP. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --SilentAria talk 09:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to First Great Awakening, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: First Great Awakening was changed by 66.118.242.7 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-20T21:22:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gackt, you will be blocked from editing. --SilentAria talk 12:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to University of Texas at San Antonio has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to University of Texas at San Antonio constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to University of Texas at San Antonio. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to University of Texas at San Antonio (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to University of Texas at San Antonio (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)