User talk:65.92.94.115
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Your edit to Celebrity
Your recent edit to Celebrity was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Celebrity. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Kuru talk 23:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
fuck you, im trying to do something about how fucked up this world is, I hope all the rich and famous rot in hell.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Celebrity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nrbelex (talk) 23:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning for editing Celebrity. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 23:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Celebrity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nrbelex (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Please don't remove warnings from your talk page. Can I ask you why you're so upset today? Your previous edits seemed very constructive and were excellent contributions. Kuru talk 23:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fallacy of logic
Guilt by association is a fallacy of logic. HighInBC 23:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
a fallacy of logic, says who ? we're talking ethics and morals, thisi s disgusting. Your fallacy of logic is just created to make the guilty innocent. Ignoring the cries of millions of people suffering and increasing youro wn wealth and posessions is wrong and disgusting, defending this makes you a sick fuck as well. People are guilty of association and they wil lbe judged, dont worry.
dont remove this, people are guilty by association. It is wrong, even if you dont believe in anything, IT IS WRONG, its disgusting. People who have accumulated so much wealth and power and do nothing. WEll its over, the time has come. Just wait bussy till peak oil hits, were gonna rob those mansions and beat the fuck outta those celebrities.
The revolution is here, so say goodbye you rich cocksuckers. You got nowhere to hide.
Your sins of worrying about just accumulating more wealth and more possessions while letting people suffer and go hungry is over. Peak Oil is here and judgement day is coming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.94.115 (talk • contribs) User:Mikereichold | User_talk:Mikereichold 22:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- I would never think of removing a comment from a user talk page. As for our disagreement... Fascinating. HighInBC 00:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |