User talk:65.88.88.153

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 65.88.88.153, is registered to New York Public Library (US) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Sockpuppetry

It is suspected that this user is a sock puppet of Ron liebman.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.


this user is suspected sockpuppet and involved in vandalism. it appears that she/he is using public library for these activities. if someone sees this happen again please contact the admins for a block.

[edit] Warnings

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

[edit] September 2007

  1. Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. WODUP 22:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

[edit] October 2007

  1. Please stop your vandal edits and deletions and posting of your opinion as content on articles .

Intothefire 07:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

  1. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jyoti Basu, you will be blocked from editing. SJP 16:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] December 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bengal appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. - Nigosh (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Khatri. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Nigosh (talk) 19:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

  1. Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Khatri. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Nigosh (talk) 23:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

  1. Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Khatri, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Nigosh (talk) 22:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

  1. Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Khatri, the Doon School and Kirat Bhattal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please don't add opinion to an article, and especially at the head of the article (as you did to Khatri). If you have a concern about the accuracy of this article, please raise it on the talk page, where a neutral accommodation of such concerns can be agreed amicably, without multiple reversions being made to the main article - Nigosh (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Prakash Karat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 16:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Prakash Karat constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC))

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Khatri. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Katrina Kaif has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Prakash Karat constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Doon School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to The Doon School.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Trusilver 17:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.