User talk:65.66.64.57

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]


[edit] September 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Nathaniel Hawthorne on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Nlu (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

[edit] Regarding edits made during January 5, 2007 (UTC) to Confederation

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Flag desecration, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Gzuckier 18:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

  1. Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Myanw 19:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Jon Tester, you will be blocked from editing. Dycedarg ж 19:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Federal Assault Weapons Ban, you will be blocked from editing. Dycedarg ж 19:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning
  4. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Paul McCartney, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --SUIT 17:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

  1. Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to 1983 in Zimbabwe. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hut 8.5 18:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2007

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to History of Alaska, you will be blocked from editing. Calliopejen1 16:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Socialist Party of America. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas(talk) 16:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to McCulloch v. Maryland, you will be blocked from editing. Bleh999 17:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

  1. Your purposeful misspelling of text on the USA PATRIOT ACT article is vandalism. Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. -- Kainaw(what?) 19:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Argentina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alanraywiki 19:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Moi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Moi was changed by 65.66.64.57 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-06T21:07:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Matt Smith (Australian politician), you will be blocked from editing. Davewild(talk) 21:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

  1. Hi, the recent edit you made to Rachel Carson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. The recent edit you made to Rachel Carson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 14:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC))
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rachel Carson, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rachel Carson was changed by 65.66.64.57 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-22T14:45:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Road Not Taken. Waggers (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Emily Dickinson poems, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Emily Dickinson poems was changed by 65.66.64.57 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-25T20:00:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Emily Dickinson poems, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. talk Prospider 20:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GBT/C 21:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to Jell-O (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Peeping Tom constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. MBisanz talk 20:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Pit and the Pendulum, you will be blocked from editing. --Midnightdreary (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Duke Kahanamoku has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 19:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Charlie Chaplin worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  S3000  ☎ 14:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Be bold constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gurch (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC))

Your recent edit to Abortion in the United States (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)