User talk:65.54.154.24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 65.54.154.24, is registered to Microsoft Corp, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] What???

Mr. Amcaja, this was not a vandalism report, you attempted to endanger my own life, by deleting a report. I understand Wikipedia does not allow telephone numbers. I could try somewhere. No, I am not tired of Charlie, (cartoon dog character) has already been mentioned.

[edit] Also you do not tell me to shut up!

It just drives me crazy to do something terrible, including my brain. - 4.188.xxx.xxx

(I guess I am using different IP's.)

[edit] November 27, 2005

This message is regarding the page Emo. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Alf melmac 09:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mar 3 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Cigarette on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. TigerShark 00:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting your grammatical error that I happened to fix. I'll be sure to go back and do it again, unless you prefer poor quality.
Sorry, my mistake. TigerShark 00:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 29 March 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Template:Wdefcon on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — natha(?)nrdotcom (T • C • W) 05:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of current programming on The Weather Channel

I'm very sorry, but I had to revert you (and a few other IPs) on that article. The reason being is that it contained some incorrect content, none of which came from you - in fact, you actually restored some of the valid information, but it didn't completely solve the problem. Again, I'm sorry I had to do this, but it was the best thing I could do. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barbaro family

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Cheers, JetLover 23:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Your recent edit to Tonka (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)