User talk:65.31.33.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by Hdayejr.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.
Attention:

This host, cpe-65-31-33-93.woh.res.rr.com, is registered to Road Runner, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] March 2008

  1. Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Jnelson09 (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
    The reason I accused you of vandalism is because you vandalized Tic-Tac-Dough, changing every instance of "Martindale" to "Fartindale." That's what I would call nonsense. --Jnelson09 (talk) 02:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
    Your user patterns indicate you are a sock puppet. I have no problems with you unless you make non-constructive edits. I, among others, will watch. Good, constrictive edits are fine.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.176.11 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 11 March 2008
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Jnelson09 (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
    Go away Dhett. You are an annoyance.65.31.33.93 (talk) 16:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  1. Who died and left you boss? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.33.93 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 13 March 2008
  2. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/hdayejr, you will be blocked from editing. ~ LegoKontribsTalkM 03:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
    Looks like the 24 ip and Gryphon are one and the same causing problems. I reported that nerd and they refused to address it. I don't need some teen punk like him causing problems on this page. That is all. 65.31.33.93 (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
    What page? You make an accusation, yet make no reference to the page in question.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.33.93 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
    3RR applies to all pages, and the warning is not specific to any particular page -- now that you have been made aware of it, don't do it on any page. The page I noticed the possiblity for 3RR, however, is Dayton Daily News. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Don't know why I am blocked and you must have the wrong person. You probably meant to block Gryphon79, which is the person that has been vandalizing this page and any edits I have made."

Decline reason: "A short scan of contributions from this IP address reveals no reason whatsoever to alter this block. — Black Kite 17:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  1. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    If you continue to remove templates from this page, you will be blocked from editing. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
    So, it's fair for Gryphon to make an accusation, but not ok for me to untag it? 65.31.33.93 (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
    I read up on the talk page guidelines and it says I can remove things if I choose. Have you read those guidelines yourself?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.33.93 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 15 March 2008
    Please note that the guidelines apply to registered accounts but not necessarily to talk pages for anonymous users. —C.Fred (talk) 03:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
    As per WP:USER, registered editor may remove -at will- any message from their own talk page. However as an unregistered editor, this talk page belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation. If you wish to enjoy the benefits of membership, you need to create an account. --Kralizec! (talk) 04:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 14:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  1. Please do not mention trolls by their specific names in articles. It only feeds them. John (talk) 03:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 19:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

--Kralizec! (talk) 19:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/User:Hdayejr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — DædαlusT@lk / Improve 17:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Insert non-formatted text here