User talk:65.216.122.126

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] James Earl Ray

You've contributed a lot of useful information about Ray's claim, after his conviction, to have been framed for the murder. However, as written it appears clearly to endorse the view that this claim is correct. While I appreciate that you probably believe so, on Wikipedia the policy of "Neutral Point of View" says that articles cannot take sides in any dispute. It would help you to consider how to rephrase the article so that it did not appear to be making a case for Ray's innocence. David | Talk 14:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Please use the "show preview" button instead of making a long series of minor edits. Thank you. Gamaliel 23:05, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. Gamaliel 18:43, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Edit summary. Gamaliel 17:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject image deletions - fair use

Please let me know what image you are referring to -Nv8200p talk 20:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Section Blanking

Thank you for experimenting with the page Linked list on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 16:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits made on May 16, 2007 (UTC) to Same Eyez on Me

Please refrain from adding nonsense, like you did to Same Eyez on Me. That's why the sandbox is there for you to experiment. If you continue, you may be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. V60 干什么？ · VDemolitions 20:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Calpol (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 22:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Punk fashion, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 23:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 23:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Your test is here. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning regarding your edits to Steampunk

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 05:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joy Browne, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joy Browne was changed by 65.216.122.126 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-10T21:40:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mims, Florida has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. MBisanz talk 03:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please help save Repo Man movie article

Hi,

This guy, Dædαlus, is in there trying to remove parts that you, I and many others contributed to the Repo Man article. Please add to the bottom of this thread on the Repo Man talk page that you think the "Notable Motifs" section should not be blanked (erased), but left as is since the Pulp Fiction article also has a "Notable Motifs" section that isn't being considered for removal at all (even by Dædαlus himself).

While I agree that the "Notable Motifs" section could use some work, it certainly won't help the article to delete the whole thing and erase all our work which consists of many multiple contributers over a course of years. I'm willing to work on it and better incorporate it into the article, he just wants to delete it all!

With consensus, we can stop this guy from deleting all our work soon!

Thanks in advance. Cowicide (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)