User talk:65.193.216.70

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding porphyria, please source your statements to WP:RS. At the moment, there is no structure at all to the article. Could you consider systematising the new content in a more accessible way? JFW | T@lk 19:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I've had to remove some of your contributions. At the moment, your additions lack sources, they come out of the blue and without much perspective (how many cases of lupus are actually due to porphyria?) and are lacking in internal links.
Please be aware that many of your contributions read like personal clinical opinions. This may be interpreted as original research. I personally have never heard of many of the points you make, and have therefore no way of knowing how authoratitive these statements are.
Porphyrias remain very rare. I would discourage adding a lot of porphyria material to an article that doesn't have much information on other, more common causes. Otherwise, one would quickly end up with a lack of balance. JFW | T@lk 21:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Concur David Ruben Talk 22:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Please respond to my message above to confirm that you are aware of the problems created by your contributions. JFW | T@lk 21:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)