User talk:65.190.103.147

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've undid your changes to the transgender article as it's basically not a neutral point of view, nor is it backed up with any references. Stating something is "slander" is a pretty major statement to make. Also your modification of the Ekins/Gendys quote made it say something they never actually said - Alison^☺ 03:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Transgender. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, as you did to Transgender, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Alison^☺ 04:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure why, but your attempt to remove all references to transsexual from the transgender article is rather transparent. Can you please discuss your changes on the talk page first? - Alison^☺ 04:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Transgender, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Alison^☺ 04:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Transgender, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Alison^☺ 04:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

You are being totally uncommunicative here. Please stop adding unsourced POV to the above article. Please - Alison^☺ 04:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] let's begin again from the beginning

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism to Template:Transgender after several requests to discuss your changes, and then several warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — coelacan — 04:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

When your block expires, please discuss the changes you would like to make, on talk pages such as Talk:Transgender. Wikipedia works by cooperation and consensus, not battle. You may also wish to register a username, which helps other users communicate with you. — coelacan — 04:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure where to say this, so please do not consider this vandalism as well. I didn't know I had received any warnings until AFTER I could no longer make edits. I am trying to cooperate here. You wanted me to talk this out, so here is my side. I apologize for the length. If this bothers the admins, they can just delete this with no worries that I will replace this.

My firm belief is that there needs to be a SEPARATE TG community that exludes all who have no desire or need for SRS, and a SEPARATE TS community that only includes those who NEED SRS. I am a TS who is part of the mainstream community and proudly NOT a TG, queer, homosexual, or part of the LGBT. I am a woman with a birth defect, not a man who chose to try to become a woman. I consider the TG as rigthfully a part of the gay community, and the TS as rightfully a part of the mainstream community. I believe that TGism, like all homsexual practices are chosen each and every time they are performed, perhaps because of moral or psychological defect. TSism is a medical condition of mainstream people which requires a medical solution. Please join my Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/ts-specific_movement if you are interested more on this viewpoint. Or you can look up TS Symposium and look at their point of view. It has some similarities to my own. It is VERY important to me that TSism be seen as a medical condition of mainstream persons and NEVER lumped in or associated with transgenderism and homosexuality. Transgenders do not need to transition. It is a mere whim for them. TSs need transition if they must avoid suicide and medical problems. TSs will NEVER have their rights as long as they are lumped in with TGs and sexual perverts. As long as TSs are seen as a type of TG/homosexual/LGBT, they will be beaten and killed, and Wikipedia will be responsible for it. It appears that a certain editor hates TSs and enjoys them getting discriminated against and killed. Why else would this person have such a vested interest in lumping the medical group in with the lifestyle/choice group?

Another thing. The TS-specific community started in the late 50's when Christine Jorgensen (a TS, not a TG) got her surgery. Transgenderism started when a terrorist named Charles Prince through a Malotov cocktail at police. He hated TSs and wanted a distancing term. So now a term created by the enemies of TSs is now being forced on TSs. Let me make it clear that I'm not a TG, but a TS, and if someone were to call me a TG in person, well, they are doing so at their own risk. Forcing the term TG on TSs is really no different than forcing the N-word on people of color. In both cases, the slurs were created by enemies of the people who were called them.

Just remember that I am not TG, I don't welcome any of their "help" in my life, and that TGs don't own me nor any other TSs. TGs have absolutely NO right to attempt to speak for TSs. Everything that TGs have done to fight for THEIR rights has been at the expense of fully-transitioning mainstreamist transsexuals.

So in conclusion, I tried to delete TSism from the transgender article because I see TGs and TSs as opposites and political enemies. Did you know that LGBTs want to destroy the rights of MtF TSs to marry as heterosexual women and force them to marry as homosexual men? TSs are not "gender variant," but gender conformists. I'm sorry for posting this rant, but I don't know where to post it where it will be seen by the editors and without incuring sanctions. Don't worry, if this is bad, I won't post it here again. But while you are at it, can you point me to other user-edited encyclopedias, perhaps some that are more lax? It is very important to me to split the medical group (TSs) from the lifestyle/choice group (TGs and other LGBTs). Let me ask one other thing, can you find a label for me (other than bigot) for true-TSs who see themselves on par with genetic women and who oppose TGism and the LGBT as much as the average mainstream person? It needs to be a term that will NEVER be added to Wikipedia's TG section, queer section, or LGBT section, and with no references to those behaviors/lifestyles except for distancing references. That is all I hope to say. If this really bothers the admins, I ask that they just delete it, not ban me from editing. I won't replace it.--65.190.103.147 21:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]