User talk:65.173.105.241

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to KFC has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ChetblongTalkSign 09:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to KFC. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: KFC was changed by 65.173.105.241 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-12T09:09:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ref Desk

Hi there, 65.x.y.z. To let you know, I reverted your initial Weekly World News diatribe from the Ref Desk because it was precisely that: a diatribe. There was no meaningful question, just an arbitrary list of crackpot conspiracy theories with no relation to each other. Since the Ref Desk specifically exhorts you not to soapbox, I removed it. This has nothing to do with WP:CENSOR, something I realize you're fond of asserting without context. It's simply a case of regulating stuff that has no place on the Ref Desk (or, most likely, anywhere else on WP). 03:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

"Debunking" and UFOs have nothing to do with this, and your exaggeration that "debunk" is a one-to-one synonym of "ridicule" is tiresome. A cursory examination of any reliable dictionary indicates that this is not the case. — Lomn 04:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)