User talk:65.122.236.133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 65.122.236.133, is registered to CORE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, Casper WY and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact CORE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, Casper WY to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jasmol 03:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Raelus 05:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Big Spring, Texas; please refer to Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view. Thanks, OhNoitsJamieTalk 04:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Please refer to Wikipedia's 3-revert-rule as well as it's policies on neutral-point-of-view. OhNoitsJamieTalk 17:58, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 3RR on Big Spring, Texas

I have blocked you for 8 hours [1] for WP:3RR on Big Spring, Texas. William M. Connolley 19:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Big Spring, Texas

The "positives" section of the text you are continually tryng to insert into the article is not any more encyclopedic than the negative part. Please participate in the discussion page and cooperate on a concenus version of the text. Kuru talk 03:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Kuru talk 03:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Evil saltine 05:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Big Spring, Texas, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Evil saltine 05:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deceptive edit summaries

Regarding this edit and edit summary: [2]; Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamieTalk 17:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

~ ApolloCreed 23:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting material on the talk page

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamieTalk 02:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dispute tag

Pleasy clarify you reasons for placing this tag. Here is the list of reasons why the tag should be used: The accuracy of an article may be a cause for concern if:

  • it contains a lot of unlikely information, without providing references.
  • it contains information which is particularly difficult to verify.
  • in, for example, a long list, some errors have been found, suggesting that the list as a whole may need further checking.
  • it has been written (or edited) by a user who is known to write inaccurately on the topic.

So far, I have not seen that any of these are occuring in this article, but welcome your comments. pschemp | talk 04:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Weatherman1126 22:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 27 September

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Happyjoe

This issue has already been dealt with. If you start it up again, you're IPs will be banned and the page will be semi-protected if necessary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)