User talk:65.116.187.190

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] February 2008

YOU PEOPLE ARE A JOKE. SOMEONE COMES ON HERE WITH BULLSHIT PROAGANDA ANDYOUR GOING TO PUT IT ON HERE......NOW WHEN I COME IN HERE WITH THE TRUTH YOU BLOCK ME............FUNNY SHIT.........THIS GOVERNMENT OWNED SITE CAN KISS MY FUCKIN ASS

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Intown Suites do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'tripod\.com' (link(s): http://intown.tripod.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your recent edit to Intown Suites (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Intown Suites

I have removed the criticism section that you insist on continually adding, based on Wikipedia:Criticism. Articles are to be balanced and have a neutral point of view and do not exists to warn or complain. They are to be informative. As I see in the history that many other editors have removed your work and you keep adding it back in, you need to discuss this change on the article's talk page to collaborate a way to work in some of the material you provided in a constructive manner. Thanks for editing. Keegantalk 19:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. richi (talk) 23:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Stanley Hilton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)