User talk:65.101.86.69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Spider-Man 3 spoilers

I removed your comment including the YouTube link because talk pages are not forums for general discussion. Wikipedia is not a repository of miscellaneous links. However, you can provide the YouTube link on Spider-Man 3 forums outside of Wikipedia. Sorry, but Wikipedia deals with encyclopedic content. I hope you understand. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 02:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:An American Tail: Fievel Goes West

Thank you for experimenting with the page Talk:An American Tail: Fievel Goes West on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Cbrown1023 20:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV content alternation

Hello, your recent edits to have been identified as original research and reverted. Please do not add your personal opinion(s) or unverified claims to Wikipedia. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Venom (Eddie Brock), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Comment

Whether you're right or not, you're only adding a non-neutral analysis. However, since you seem to know the storyline, I'd welcome an expansion. Instead of calling Gwen snobbish, you could describe Eddie's attempt(s) to "woe" her and her reaction. You see, Wikipedia only deals in verifiable, objective content. We let that content speak for itself. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 03:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Charlie Brown

Your recent edit to Charlie Brown has been reverted (and not by me, this time). Please see the article's Talk page for an explanation why. Aside from the whole "loser" issue (and it does no one any favors to deny that the character fits into the "lovable loser" mold - Charlie Brown is beloved largely because he loses), the point of a baseball pitch is for the batter to be unable to hit it. Charlie Brown can throw hard and accurately, but if the batter hits a home run with it, the pitch was anything but "perfect." That's just how baseball works. Regards, and Happy New Year! Karen | Talk | contribs 06:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] We've been over this, man

Hello, your recent edits to Spider-Man 3 have been identified as original research and reverted. Please do not add your personal opinion(s) or unverified claims to Wikipedia. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 02:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

It might be best, if you do find reliable sources, to start a discussion on the talk page. The character section is a minor outline of each actor's role. The plot section should have the major details. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jason Todd, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mr.Z-mantalk 22:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)