User talk:65.100.102.97

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --J. Nguyen 02:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --J. Nguyen 03:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase this page or any of the warnings on it.

— Kbh3rdtalk 23:05, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


Please do not remove warnings from your talk page. If you continue to do so, this page will be protected from editing. Thanks. --Ichiro 06:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Kbh3rdtalk 17:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


Please unblock me. I didn't think I was doing anything wrong. I cited what I thought were reliable sources and really do believe Matt Leinart was gay. You are abusing your power as an admin if you block people after good faith edits.


You have been blocked from editing for repeatedly vandalizing Matt Leinart and blanking warnings on this talk page. So that you are better prepared to contribute in a constructive manner when the block expires, you might want to review Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources.

I'll let other admins decide whether the block should be lifted. They should take note that you have repeatedly added what I would consider less than rumor to the article in the face of repeated reverts, and you have repeatedly blanked this talk page in violation of Wikipedia policy and inspite of warnings not to do so. So I remain rather skeptical of your protestations of innocense. Your so-called "reliable" sources to the subject being gay are an anonymous blog post (with no source cited), and that someone also anonymous thought he winked, which need not even be sexually related anyway. — Kbh3rdtalk 18:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

— Kbh3rdtalk 18:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC) ---

Removal of warnings from user talk pages is considered vandalism. — Kbh3rdtalk 05:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)