User talk:64.46.2.216

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First, a

Welcome!

Hello, 64.46.2.216, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

[edit] Croatia Records

I have noticed that you are very interested in article about this company :) Using source which you have provided I have rewrited article because of wikipedia NPOV policy. To make long story short when there is dispute it is not possible to use 1 side arguments like facts if there is no court decision which is confirming this source. Because of that I have edited article. I am sure that your english is better of mine so your help in this article is still needed. --Rjecina (talk) 06:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

You are making mistake about his albums. His last albums has been Balkanska rapsodija (Jugoton 1989) and Balegari ne vjeruju sreći (Jugoton 1990.) so it is not possible that he has been angry on Jugoton before 1991 !.
He has left Zagreb in 1986 for Utrecht, Netherlands trying to sing on English but after his album "It ain't Like In The Movies At All" (Diskoton 1986. trostruki) has been debakl he has returned in Zagreb during 1987 when Azra has published new album "Između krajnosti" (Jugoton 1987.). In 1995 and 1997 he has even published new albums "Sevdah za Paulu Horvat", "Anali" , "Blase" but for other company because of which we can think that break between Jugoton/Croatia Records and him has been created between 1990-1995 ! You are having all this data in article about him so for me is hard to believe that you are making good faith mistakes ?--Rjecina (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Problem is solved ? --Rjecina (talk) 15:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
OK.--Rjecina (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edit on Croatia Records

Hello!

I apologize if I'm misinterpreting something but I'd like to point out something about this edit you made on the Croatia Records article, more specifically the edit summary. You reverted the previous edit of user Rjecina (talk · contribs) back to your own version, which is perfectly fine, but your edit summary contained RVV which, according to Wikipedia:Edit_summary_legend#Revert to a previous edit, means reverting vandalism. When Rjecina reverted your last edit on that article, he/she labelled your edit as vandalism and I was quick to point out that he was wrong.

Now I feel that it's only fair to warn you the same way because it's clear to me that the two of you are involved in a content dispute in this article and neither one of you should label the other one a vandal during that dispute since that would be very disruptive. If i'm misinterpreting what you meant by RVV, please let me know and accept my apologies. If you are, in fact, calling Rjecina a vandal, I will ask you to please take a look at what vandalism is not and pay particular attention to NPOV violations and Stubbornness and you will see that Rjecina's revert of your edit is not considered vandalism.
Please be careful of accusing editors of vandalism in the future when their edits don't constitute deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia.
Thanks! SWik78 (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:Vandalism defines vandalism as addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia (note the words deliberate and compromise the integrity). It goes on to say Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. Rjecina's edits are not made in bad faith, therefore, you are incorrect in calling him a vandal just as he is incorrect in calling you a vandal. Regardless of how inaccurate the information is he inserts or how much text he deletes, it's not vandalism until he does it specifically to harm Wikipedia. Please familiarize yourself with the definition of vandalism before accusing others of it again. It is not helpful to do so just because you don't agree with someone else's edits. SWik78 (talk) 00:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)