User talk:64.251.54.66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 64.251.54.66, is registered to Wolcott Public Schools and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Maize. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 12:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

Your recent edit to Maize (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 12:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Koch, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 15:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Koch, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Robert Koch was changed by 64.251.54.66 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Is fat' on 2007-09-14T11:04:43+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 15:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nintendo DS Lite. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nintendo DS Lite, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MGS4

Please stop with your 'bitter' edits just because you got reprimanded over that Nuns of the Vatican BS you were espousing about. While you are blocked right now, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to the talk page of Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots after the block is lifted, you WILL be banned from editing. Eaglestorm 14:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Taft-Hartley Act, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 23:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cobra, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 15:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Oklahoma City bombing, you will be blocked from editing. Ioeth 15:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

—Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Juan Ponce de León, you will be blocked from editing. Alexf(Talk/Contribs) 17:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wolcott, Connecticut, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wolcott, Connecticut. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wolcott, Connecticut was changed by 64.251.54.66 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-02T08:27:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wolcott, Connecticut, you will be blocked from editing. E Wing (talk) 12:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Ray Charles (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Man Man has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Video production‎. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Art Smart (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Man Man constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC))

Your recent edit to Miele (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)