User talk:64.251.48.126

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 64.251.48.126, is registered to State of Connecticut Dept of InformationTechnology CONNECTICUTEDUCATIONNETWORK , and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. FireFox 17:48, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 18:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Your edit to Julius Caesar

Your recent edit to Julius Caesar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Brownfield land on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 15:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Brownfield land. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBadger 15:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Nitrosomonas, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 12:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Naugatuck, Connecticut

Your recent edit to Naugatuck, Connecticut (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Naugatuck, Connecticut, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp 14:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Alphachimp 14:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Day of the Dead

Your recent edit to Day of the Dead (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Hot chocolate

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee 17:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Balloon

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been blocked before; please display learning behavior. NewEnglandYankee 18:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jan 2007

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Italy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. David Underdown 15:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the John Fielden page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adambro 15:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to John Fielden:

Your recent edit to John Fielden (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 15:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --lightdarkness (talk) 17:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Febuary 9, 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Three 6 Mafia, you will be blocked from editing. Burzmali 18:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Pacal I has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 18:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Xavier Ortiz

Your recent edit to Xavier Ortiz (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Radiation. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Nivix talk 13:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Radiation. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Nivix talk 13:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.



[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Crapper, you will be blocked from editing. Ctbolt 13:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Thomas Crapper has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 14:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Thomas Crapper. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing – Gurch 14:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Strontium (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Arthur Conan Doyle, you will be blocked from editing. Stephen Burnett 13:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to chromium, you will be blocked from editing. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 12:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to lead, you will be blocked from editing. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 12:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1985 Mexico City earthquake, you will be blocked from editing. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 12:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for vandalism

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Fire Star 火星 13:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page 1887 Yellow River flood on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Diniz (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to 1887 Yellow River flood, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Diniz (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 13:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] High School Antics

This IP should probably be blocked permanently. Anyone who wishes to contribute could easily create an account, and because this is a high school, the likelihood of these acts of vandalism being curtailed at all is very low. I doubt the vandalism is being done by one person, and since the edits are mostly malicious, opening wikipedia to the unnamed public in this case is not worth the potential vandalism. As a wikipediaphile, I loathe the idea of my peers being able to 'contribute' any longer. JRNorbergé 14:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  MBisanzBot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

-- Longhair\talk 13:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Cadmium (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kbdank71 16:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)