User talk:64.241.37.140

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 64.241.37.140, is registered to Panera LLC and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Panera LLC to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Adelaide Crapsey, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from web sites. For more information, take a look at our policy library. Happy editing! FreplySpang (talk) 9 July 2005 00:05 (UTC)

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. Gamaliel 21:16, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you will have to substantiate your claim somehow. Gamaliel 03:20, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Crapsey

She was a poet? You couldn't easily tell by reading the article, hence the tag. How about putting a summary of what she did into a lead section? Dunc|☺ 21:45, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Hi 64.241.37.140. I appreciate your taking the time to communicate.
  • The process of copyvio review takes place by people placing comments either on the Wikipeda:Copyright problems page or on the article's talk page. I favour the former. The admin taking final action (after about a week) should check both. I note that it's actually relatively rare for a copyvio to be contested, and most pass without comment. The ones that are contested often end up in the sections at the top of the page, and get considered for longer.
  • I feel that I should clear up one other point. You seem to be drawing a firm line between me and my "editorial colleagues", and yourself. We are all editors, including you, and WIkipedia is the result of our community efforts. Some editors are also admins, and have access to certain additional facilities, but other than that, they are not supposed to have particular control over content. We are peers, you and I, and I am merely acting in line with what I believe to be community consensus, and in the way I think will be most helpful to you.
  • Regarding avenues of complaint, see Wikipedia:General complaints and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You can get general help on using Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Help desk.
  • Re 1. The new messages notice appears if someone has modified your user talk page since you last viewed it. I get the same message when you leave me a note. Unfortunately, because you're not logged in, I can only leave a message for your IP address and hope that it doesn't change the next time you visist. This is one good reason to log in. I will often copy messages I write onto my own talk page to make them easier to find. If you're looking at a user page or user talk page, you should see a link at the left under "Toolbox" labelled "E-mail this user". For users who have supplied an address (like me), this allows for private communication. (I'm not sure whether this works when you aren't logged in.) I do, however, prefer open communication on my user talk page if it's at all possible.
  • Re 2. The EB page I'm referring to is the one originally referenced. I hope you'll see why I see some similarity. I imagine that some Wikipedians have a subscription, but I do not.
  • Re 3. I covered the practice of restoring copyvio notices above, and I haven't done enough research to comment more specifically. It was rude of people not to respond to your question about how to prove ownership. I can't offhand find a page that documents the answer, but the usual two options are either to send a mail from the same domain as the website to a trusted Wikipedian (say an admin), or to place a notice on the website. In both cases, it's important that the message explicitly releases the text under the GFDL (or into the public domain). Wikipedia does not, in general, use text "with permission". This is important because there are others who reuse Wikipedia content under the GFDL. By the way, you would be amazed at some of the bold but unfounded claims past contributors have made about copyright ownership. It is to protect ourselves, and the rights of copyright owners, that we try to be so careful, and not take things at face value.
  • Re 4. You are quite correct. I apologise if my remark was snide.
  • Re 5. I do not have access to any special posting info. It's all available to everyone, although some of it is better hidden or harder to use. I seem to have developed a "nose" for likely copyright violations. (Note that I did not, I think, make the initial identification for any of your articles.)
  • Re 6. I understand your position. My position is to use my account, and guard its reputation.
  • Re 7 and 8. See Wikipedia:Template messages. This is not complete, but it is most of the useful ones.

Bovlb 02:05:18, 2005-07-14 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for impersonating another user, personal attacks, and general disruption. You have been informed of the poilicies of this site and you have chosen to disregard them. I'm sorry we got off on the wrong foot, but that hardly excuses your insults, ignoring and breaking Wikipedia policies, and your general obnoxious behavior. If you can act with a modicum of civility, we can let this be the end of it, or you can choose to continue and escalate your behavior, but whatever happens, it is entirely up to you. Gamaliel 00:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

Hi 64.241.37.140,
  • Re 1 and 2: I don't have access to any additional facilities. I am a run-of-the-mill editor like you, not an administrator. Flagging suspected copyright violations is something any editor can do; it does not require administrator privileges. The procedure for doing this is described on WP:CP. It does take an administrator to delete a page, however, which is the usual result from suspected copyright violations. The notice is posted on the article in question, and on the WP:CP page, nowhere else. Again, I have no subscription to EB, nor any tools except search engines for detecting copyright violations.
  • Re 3: If you scroll down WP:CP, you'll see it consists mainly of reports, with the occasional comment, many of which are not from the original poster. Typically the original contributor does not respond at all within the seven day window. There are many new contributors who happily copy-and-paste from other websites, with utter disregard of their copyright notices, and our policies. Have a look at some of the listed items for examples. Most entries on the WP:CP page are in dated sections under "New listings", but some have "fallen off the top" into "Older than 7 days".
  • Re 4: If you look at the original report on WP:CP#July 11, you'll see that Duk listed that URL. Presumably the same URL also appeared in the original copyright notice. How that URL was found, I have no idea, but I would suspect search engines before spyware. 8-) It's by a human comparison of that page with yours that I perceive a certain amount of similarity in phrasing and structure. I'm prepared to accept that it's within the bounds of coincidence.
  • Re 5: You are correct; permit me to clarify. People often reproduce text from other websites citing permission with various constraints like "in Wikipedia", "for non-commercial purposes", "providing it is quoted without alteration", or "on condition that the source is credited in a particular way". Unfortunately, none of those (except perhaps the last) is satisfactory for text in Wikipedia for the reasons I explained above.
  • Re 6: New articles can be seen at Special:Newpages. Changes to all articles can be seen at Special:Recentchanges. Everyone has their own criteria for which entries they check, but most people are more suspicious of anonymous users than of logged in users.
  • I note with regret that Gamaliel has just blocked you for 24 hours. In the same circumstances, were I an administrator, I would probably not have done this, but you have to admit that you did twist each other's tails quite a bit. Perhaps this will give you a chance to concentrate on your other project. 8-) Note that you can still edit your user page, and I think you can still send e-mails using the "E-mail this user" link. I'll add a note to both entries on WP:CP that we are in a dialogue.
  • This is probably an unnecessary remark, but I feel I should point out that if you edit Wikipedia from a different address and identify yourself to me, I will feel obliged to report it as block evasion. This is independent of my feelings about the block itself. Sorry.

Bovlb 03:47:11, 2005-07-16 (UTC)

[edit] Skate punk, Ussher-Lightfoot Calendar

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Owen× ☎ 21:16, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Owen× ☎ 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Owen× ☎ 21:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] December

This message is regarding the page Traumatic masturbatory syndrome. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Krich (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] January 2006

Regarding your edits to Wicca, we have a policy here called Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Actively trying to argue that Wicca is not a religion is a major violation of it and standas no chance of surviving on the page longer than a few minutes. If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia, please learn how things are done here. DreamGuy 02:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to WXYZ-TV was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:38, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Thunder, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adambiswanger1 21:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Keelm 21:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Zhavric

Your recent edit to Zhavric (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 14:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Literacy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Scientizzle 16:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Mapletip 15:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Andorra. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Pcbene 20:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Gentgeen 20:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Kingsport, Tennessee

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --Takeel 01:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --Takeel 17:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


Just so you know, this is an open WiFi connection at a restaurant in Oregon. Hundreds of people per day use this open wifi connection. 64.241.37.140 04:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spamming of http://www.franteractive.net

franteractive.net

Spam sock accounts

Sam mishra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
69.109.170.45 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
69.109.171.10 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
69.109.127.108 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
69.86.44.129 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
64.164.147.119 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
64.241.37.140 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Hu12 19:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Integrity. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Real96 01:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Keynesian economics, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. KatalavenoTC 00:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tree of Life, you will be blocked from editing. Apparently, you're not getting the message. Silliness is not appreciated, especially when you probably are capable of making real, useful changes to articles. Please, if you'd like some help, just ask, OK? Esseh 01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you vandalize articles again, as you did to the Jon Heder article by adding really non-notable junk, you will be blocked from Wikipedia. --Addict 2006 02:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to You, you will be blocked from editing. Mawfive 03:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Taxidermy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ... discospinster talk 00:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Lagos. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 21:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mann Gulch fire

Your recent edits to Mann Gulch fire are quite impressive. Can you add a source for your additions? Rl 22:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to J.D. (Scrubs), you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 22:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Egg yolk. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Javit 19:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Knife, you will be blocked from editing. -- Hdt83 Chat 23:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Woodstock Festival (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 00:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Panera Bread, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox next time. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 12:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Messiah College. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Messiah College, you will be blocked from editing.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Messiah College, you will be blocked from editing.

Please see the policy on the three revert rule as well as on biographies of living persons and on notability. Your edits to Messiah College do not appear to meet any of these guidelines / policies and thus are seen as vandalism, thanks. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Valente (artist):

Your recent edit to Valente (artist) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 14:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neck

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. spam.spine-health.com --Ronz (talk) 21:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Also to Pain management --Ronz (talk) 21:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "can't edit anonymously from Panera and can't create username"

Decline reason: "Sorry, as anyone can use this connection, it has had a long history of vandalism. We encourage you to create an account at home and then log in if you wish to edit here. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "But, I don't have internet at home. Does this mean I can't edit Wikipedia?"

Decline reason: "Like stated below, you are going to have to log in using another internet connection. Anyone can use this connection, it has had a long history of vandalism. — Tiptoety talk 01:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You could always edit from a public place like a liberary (assuming that it isn't block as well) or you could create an account to edit with.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 23:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I can't create an account to edit with. This IP is blocked. Please unblock. Thanks! 64.241.37.140 (talk) 00:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
You can always try creating an account on another IP. I would love to help you but I'm not an admin so I can't.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 00:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)