User talk:64.238.49.65

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding your change of astronaut names on STS-118: Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - Ageekgal 18:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page HART Protocol on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — ERcheck (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to August 17. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 17:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Electricity generation

Thank you for your contribution to Electricity generation. Since the sentence you modified does not actually say the sources are in order of importance, you don't have to provide a source that lists them in order of importance. However, it would improve the article if you could provide a source. --Gerry Ashton 19:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Microsoft Management Console on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - Gilliam 06:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Microsoft Management Console. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- Gilliam 06:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Rulers of Kosovo. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are however welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Bob f it 16:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mitsubishi Eclipse

Well hello, 64.238.49.65. It seems that your latest contributions constitute vandalism of Wikipedia. I just wanted to let you know that we do not like it when you vandalize pages here. Would you like it if I came up with a magic marker and scribbled all over a report you worked so hard on? Well, when you vandalize Wikipedia, that is pretty much what you are doing. Don't take this personally or as a threat, but as a warning that you are violating Wikipedia's rules. Sure, you may be tempted, or think you will get a laugh, but all you are really doing is just creating pain for the millions of people who are using Wikipedia as a reference, and making the jobs of editors like myself that much harder. I hope that you understand where I am coming from and make serious contributions from now on. Karrmann

[edit] September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to AdventureQuest. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 17:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] protection

it should be protected, libelous info which blatantly violates WP:BLP keeps being added.Boomgaylove (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Daedalus class battlecruiser has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One (Review) 17:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yamaha Blaster, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yamaha Blaster was changed by 64.238.49.65 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-17T16:55:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Young Muslims. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rami R 15:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)