User talk:64.179.37.3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 64.179.37.3, is registered to Saint Vincent College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CryptoDerk 16:33, May 24, 2005 (UTC)


Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Seven dirty words. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Satori Son 00:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Joaquin Phoenix, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to MuscleTech, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Brianyoumans 18:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to cloud. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sengkang 07:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jake Westbrook, you will be blocked from editing. crazyviolinist 04:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dan Kreider, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dan Kreider was changed by 64.179.37.3 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-01T03:11:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 03:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Viking has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 04:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to County seat, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: County seat was changed by 64.179.37.3 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-09T20:11:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Big Prairie, Ohio, you will be blocked from editing. Nyttend (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Printing press has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Michael Richards (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Richards, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Mammal (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 09:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —EncMstr 09:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Geibel Catholic High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sandwich, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to Day of the Dead (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to United States Constitution, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AVandtalkcontribs 20:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Brigadier General (United States)

Thank you for your intiative in adding information to the Brigadier General (United States) article, however the information you provided is not completely accurate. Under 10 U.S.C. § 777 general officers cannot be frocked unless all stipulations of the code are met. One if which is the officer is serving in, or has received orders to serve in, a position for which that grade is authorized. Frocking is not normally authorized to general officers for the fact that, as you say, it can take up to two years to receive a new billet that requires the rank from their service shief of staff. General officers, if frocked, are done so normally if they are nominated to fill a position that is set by statute, for example, the Deputy Judge Advocate General of the Army. Furthermore, confirmed general officers for promotion must be approved to be frocked by the SECDEF or a Senated confirmed civilian working in the Office of the SECDEF, whom has delegated authority to appove frocking from the SECDEF. The SECDEF must also submit to Congress a written notification of the intent to authorize the officer to wear the insignia for that grade and a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date of the notification before frocking can be given to a general officer.

Also, frocking ranks should not be covered in particular ranks because the code applies that all ranks in the uniformed services. Neovu79 (talk) 04:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)