User talk:64.142.89.105

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

IP address: 64.142.89.105
Hostname: 64-142-89-105.dsl.static.sonic.net
ISP: SONIC.NET, INC.
Country: United States
as of 22:00, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rx StrangeLove 4 July 2005 15:21 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. -- Fuzheado | Talk 4 July 2005 15:24 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing. --JYolkowski // talk 6 July 2005 21:52 (UTC)

Please give it up with the vandalism of Hephaestos' talk page. Fuzheado, Danny, other users and I are so sick of this. -- Mike Garcia | talk 6 July 2005 21:55 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --JYolkowski // talk 6 July 2005 22:02 (UTC)

Reblocked. -- Infrogmation 9 July 2005 02:26 (UTC)

[edit] Round 2

Please do not vandalize articles. This sort of offense can include inserting nonsense into articles, blanking articles, or otherwise changing articles with obviously unwanted content. This serves no other purpose than creating more work for Wikipedia's editors and administrators. If you do continue, your account and/or IP will be blocked. Kelly Martin 17:34, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing. Kelly Martin 17:36, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --JYolkowski // talk 17:38, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hey!

You bastards can't block or ban me! Whoever does it again, has no life! 64.142.89.105 13:44, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

I'd say that description (having no life) does indeed sum up the majority of Wikipedia's admins. But yes, we can block you. - Mark 13:45, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
I don't care! I don't care! I don't care! You guys suck (especially you Mark) and the next time I return unbanned you better not block me again! 64.142.89.105 14:05, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Well thank you for that assessment. I wasn't the one who blocked you, by the way. - Mark 08:03, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

This account has been blocked for repeat vandalism of articles. Because you have already been blocked a number of times a longer block than is normal has been imposed this time.

If you continue to vandalise this site when this block expires you may be subject to an even longer block. Wikipedia reserves the right to place a permanent block on someone who repeatedly vandalises its site despite repeated requests to stop.

Wikipedia is a serious project by thousands of genuine users. Out of respect for the project and for its large number of genuine users vandalism on the scale practiced by you will not tolerated.

[edit] System of a Down

Please do not make threatening edit summaries. If it continues, you may be prevented from editing. kmccoy (talk) 04:36, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked from editing

This IP has been blocked from editing Wikipedia for its history of repeated vandalism and other violations of Wikipedia policy. Fire Star 04:39, 15 August 2005 (UTC).

[edit] Sweet Alice

Removing the template from an article being considered for deletion constitutes avoidant vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Thanks. -- ChrisB 03:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tell me

Where do you find time to edit Wikipedia all day?

It seems that you "are" without a life. And a basic comprehension of standard English. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheNewMinistry (talk • contribs) .

[edit] Blocked

I've blocked you for breaking the WP:3RR on Guns N' Roses. When your block expires, do not continue to revert that article. Especially as this is an American vs British English issue and guidelines suggest that when the subject of the article is American, American English should be used. British English should be used on articles about British bands. Consensus has been reached, which should be followed. If you feel like you have more arguments to make (and by arguments I mean reasons, not shouting), then continue to do so on the talk page.

In addition edits like this are not acceptable (I also think that edits like the one above by TheNewMinistry are not acceptable either). See WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Petros471 20:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Collective Nouns

Please stop reverting RJN's edits to pages such as 10 Years and Rival Schools. He is putting the verbs in the correct person. The word years in 10 Years is plural it is in reference to the number of years; the band name as a whole is singular. Therefore, the verb that should be used is 3rd person singular—not plural.

[edit] blink-182

Please tell me why you are reverting a compromise with the note "please discuss on talk page" when there is no immediate evidence that you are discussing this. The compromise text eliminates the argument. RadioKirk talk to me 16:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I have replied. Thank you for helping make Wikipedia better by citing a reliable source for each edit so other users can see the facts. :) RadioKirk talk to me 17:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 27 May 2006

By reverting once more to the "was/is" war, it is clear you have every intention of using Wikipedia to prove you're "right" while willfully avoiding any attempt at compromise. In addition, IPs 64.142.89.105 and 65.222.216.15 are being used for tag-team reversions in attempt to avoid Wikipedia's rules against revert-wars. This language is factual, and it is to remain intact because it should be the goal of all of us for Wikipedia to be correct, not its editors. Further reversions will violate WP:3RR and WP:POINT and will be dealt with either through page proection or blocking your ability to edit the encyclopedia, or both. RadioKirk talk to me 17:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fear Factory

I reverted your changes to Fear Factory. Wikipedia entries should be written to be time-neutral and your addition was not. Please let me know if you need a more detailed explanation. --Yamla 15:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Smashing Pumpkins

  • Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Danny Lilithborne 01:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)