User talk:64.131.205.111

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] IP address sometimes used by YoSoyGuapo

 YoSoyGuapo 00:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, as they speak more against the attacker than against me.

too caught up


[edit] May 2007

This information is in the article. Read again. The article states: "Two of the country's former presidents Juan Bosch and Joaquín Balaguer, both had had parents who immigrated from Puerto Rico." Also you did not insert this information but undid all of my recent edits. Don't to this with an misleading edit summary or your edits will be undone. Regards. VirtualDelight 21:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


In response to your talk page "This information is in the article. Read again. The article states: "Two of the country's former presidents Juan Bosch and Joaquín Balaguer, both had had parents who immigrated from Puerto Rico." Also you did not insert this information but undid all of my recent edits. Don't to this with an misleading edit summary or your edits will be undone. Regards. VirtualDelight 21:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)"

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Dominican Republic

Please discuss your edits on the talk page rather than continually inserting your point of view. I have no opinion either way as to whether the La Trinitaria could be considered a racist organization or not, but this has degenerated into edit-warring and is not acceptable. Thanks. -- LeCourT:C 01:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

La Trinitario funder actually admire Haiti, the reason for the separation was that simply didn't work out. If you want me find your source then I will, but can ask you, do you Spanish so I can find you what Juan Pablo Duarte wrote User:Avfnx


Look, I'm really trying to assume good faith and give you some good advice. Please stop! If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Discuss the issues of racism on the Talk page first. Then, once agreement has been reached, introduce it into the article. You'll need reliable sources, not just the occasional blog or travel website. Find newspapers, real magazines, books, anything reliable. Please remember that the threshold for inclusion of information in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. I really don't care either way about the racism issue, but you really need to do your part and cooperate on the Talk page, not just inserting and reverting. If you bring up your points on the Talk page, I -- as an impartial third party -- will be happy to review them and provide assistance and advice. That applies to both sides of the issue. Thanks! -- LeCourT:C 19:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Apologies!!! I added the warning to the wrong user page. It was meant for here. Sorry! -- LeCourT:C 20:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

User User:Avfnx and I have agreed that it is extremist in nature and it wouldn't be included. Please look at the talk page of the article. You may have misread something. 64.131.205.111 20:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning to User:71.255.247.181

Umm, that seemed a bit harsh for offense number one. Please assume good faith, especially on a first-time edit to an article. -- LeCourT:C 01:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your threat to block me

Did you not even read what I did? I fixed a grammatical and substantive problem with the text. I checked the source and found that the Wikipedia entry did not accurately portray the information from the source. Furthermore, there was a punctuation problem that made it impossible to understand. Now you've returned it to the way it was. Incorrect and with the wrong grammar.

It's great that you are keeping an eye on the site, but going around and calling valid input "vandalism" without even responding to the content isn't helping the end result. And threatening to block me was really uncalled for. The information that I am removing is biased and anti-Dominican,hence it should be considered vandalism .Please refrain from adding your political ,cultural ,and social views to the article .Its very obvious where your views lean toward ,do not use Wikipedia to mis-lead and release false information. from 68.239.134.45

I never threatened to block anyone ,you probably have me mistaken for another user .Also,false information was the wrong term to use . The proper term is mis-information. from 68.239.134.45

Please refrain from name calling and personal attacks. This is against wikipedia policy. I am not inserting extreme nor slanderous information. I am not anti-dominican in any manner. Utilizing sources such as the Dominican Institute at CCNY would not be considered to be anti-dominican. Anything concerning that article would be better spoken about at the talk page of the article. 64.131.205.111 17:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mis-informed and baised

Well then I apologize , I was not aware that I was name calling or personally attacking anyone.However, most of the text I originally removed came from biased and anti-Dominican sources.The text under the "Creation of the Republic" is in-accurate ,the source does not support this text "In 1822 Haitian liberation forces unified the entire island under a free government of color, ending 300 years of colonial domination and slavery. Roads were built; school curriculums were changed from a Spanish view to a worldview. Institutions of European colonialism were also phased out, and replaced with ones more representative and respectful of Taino and African culture. Land was redistributed communally and individuals who had benefited from the Spanish invasion and domination of the island were rightfully expelled [5]."[[1]].The text cannot be found on the website.Also,This describes the Haitian occupation as a liberation (sound familiar?),its an overwhelmingly biased peace of text.Part of the text under the Immigration section of the article "Most Haitian immigrants work at low-paying, unskilled labor jobs, including construction work and household cleaning. Current estimates put the Haitian-born population in the Dominican Republic as high as 1 million; slightly less than the illegal Dominican born population in the United States and Puerto Rico[citation needed]." is also in-accurate ,according to www.census.gov there are 1.1 million Dominicans in the United states both legally and Illegally .It is a well known fact that most Dominicans in the U.S.A are in the country legally."Compared to other Latino groups such as Mexicans or Puerto Ricans, Dominican population movements are relatively new. More than 98 percent of the 810,201 Dominicans legally admitted to the United States between 1931 and 1998 arrived after 1961. The statistics suggest a sudden and steadily increasing tide of immigrants from the Dominican Republic in the past four decades. By the 1980s, Dominicans had become one of the fastest growing segments of the foreign-born population in the United States. In the 1990s, the Dominican exodus continued unabated and diversified its regional destinations to new places in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean, as well as North America. Sizeable Dominican communities now exist in Italy, Switzerland, Canada, Panama, Aruba, Martinique, and St. Thomas. Again, the folk term los países seems particularly apt to capture the wide dispersal of the Dominican diaspora."[[http://migration.ucdavis.edu/ceme/more.php?id=19_0_6_0 ]]Also,under in the text of the Immigration , "Although Dominican economic groups have called for amnesty for Illegal Dominicans living in the US" this claim is also baseless .

Ask the person who placed this information in. in 2 paragraphs what are you stating? This too broad and would be better divided into sections. 64.131.205.111 00:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Look

Dont talk damn bullshit about me citing information. First of all get a damn account. I have to much experienced for you to be talking crap. I am tired of the stupid vandalism made by annonymous accounts in the DOminican Republic article, and if you dont like my editing suck it DAMN it!Get a damn account and then yout talk crap!(and if you interested on seeing my experienced jobs see the Santo Domingo Article which i made it almost by myself)EdwinCasadoBaez 01:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Get an Account

Dont blame me for vandalism that i didnt do and now u want them to block me!!great Job Buddy!!as i said before try getting an account and now being annonymous!I am expert in Dominican topics and you just come up to my talk page saying to cite my reference!!omgEdwinCasadoBaez 01:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:edwincasadobaez

You cant be reverting things without the concent of others... dont care who you are but you can revert or undo stuff with concensus...I think you dont know anything about the Dominican Repulic and am sorry to say that!You cant be adding things without knowing and taking information out of sources that are not accurate!!

They are things in this page that bug me and just because you have sources from Hispaniola.com it doesnt mean is true! People have written that 90% of dominican are african ancestry wich is not true and Some said that "Spanish" was a left over from spain while others say "La trinitaria was a Racist secret union"(Not true and is embarrasing to hear this in a encyclopedia) which is not true either.Please make me a favor and do not use annoynimous IP adresses. Make a real account becuase thi is bugging me out and am going to revert your edit too!Dont Revert my edits without asking me because i have a lot of knowledge in my countrys topics, if you dont believe see My articles!EdwinCasadoBaez 23:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Am not harrasing your page!!i am discussing something and telling you to stop reverting my edit the same way you done it for the past 3 days!if you dont agree with what somebody writes dont delete it but actually discuss it...and dats what you havent done over here!and then yesterday you acussed me of vandalism without realizing that reverting somebodys edit can be considered vandalism!EdwinCasadoBaez 02:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


Look at all the messages you left to me and the tone. That is harrassment. Please cease from contacting me unless you're on a talk page of an article 64.131.205.111 03:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

making sense [2] 64.131.205.111 01:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Not every edit made by other editors is vandalism. You might be getting a bit too caught up in this article. -- LeCourT:C 05:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


COULD YOU PLEASE STOP HARRASING MY PAGE BY SENDING ME LIKE 20 WARNINGS/second..You are getting my talk page ful of warnings so stop it!EdwinCasadoBaez 05:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


Warnings for every incident of personal attack 64.131.205.111 05:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


Your addition of the "Crime" section was deleted not because it wasn't cited, but because it is POV. If you are planning to do major changes (like creating a new section, please discuss it on the talk page).Dominican 18:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE DONT NOT REVERT EDITS!!!Let Other wikipedians reach consensus about what should stay and what should be removed...YOU REMOVE EVERY SINGLE EDIT I MAKE!I AM GOING TO TALK TO AN ADMNISTRATOR FOR THAT IF YOU KEEP DOING IT!64.52.120.98 19:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)(User:EdwinCasadoBaez)


unless you sign in, I won't know if you are edwincadado. you could be a random user stating that you are him. 64.131.205.111 20:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Well yes it was me..You are reverting my edits and everybody else edits here in wikipedia..Thats not funny looking and then you Say that i'm the one that should get blamed!!!You should watch out with your revertions because i placed references on each of my edits and the u revert them!!!not cool!EdwinCasadoBaez 21:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DDP and 3nis

Even thougth is a gang in the United states in not crime related to DR...The crime they do is outside DR so that means they not part of the crime that goes on in DR...Some of the youth in this gangs are from other nations not only DR. Anyways we should write in the crime section only crimes that involve the NATION OF DR not gangs that impose violence out of DR. 3nis and DDP are nowhere to be found in DR so why have them there! You should put them in the Crime Section of NYC or In the Crime Section of Boston,etc but not in the Dominican Article! Do you understand what am trying to say? EdwinCasadoBaez 04:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Archive undo

It's true there are conversations going on, but most of the dicussion page is already concluded discussions, only a few points remained inconclusive. The talk page is getting too large. We need to archive some of that really soon. Dominican 22:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block me then

There different number on how many people so make sense to put the lowest number and say over. Like i said before im not going argue w/ you but i will work around you. And don't worry i will have new information on the immigration so your propaganda will stop. Read and you see there different number. And they were many reason why USA supported Trujillo, what u wanna name only one in () how about we name them all in (). Expand it if you want but don't drop it in () Avfnx 05:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Possible Racist text

In 1838 Juan Pablo Duarte the son of a Spanish born merchant, formed along with Spanish descended Ramón Matías Mella and Francisco del Rosario Sanchez founded a racist secret society called La Trinitaria created to overthrow and undermine any government run by people of color. Driven by a belief in white supremacy and a desire to create a counter-revolutionary white-catholic run state, the Trinitarios declared independence from Haiti on February 27, 1844 [3] . Drawing inspiration from St. Dominic's Order of Preachers responsible for the murders of hundreds of thousands of Jews and Moors during the Spanish Inquisition, The name Dominican Republic was chosen as a testament of white supremacy over individuals of color. This victory inspired other white supremacist movements in the western hemisphere, notably the Ku Klux Klan. The victory of La Trinataria also inspired significant parts of the plot of D.W. Griffith's famous silent movie "A Birth Of A Nation" in 1915. In 1937 around 30,000 Haitians were killed in order to "whiten" up the country. [4][5] for discussion 64.131.205.111 07:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Convo

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=next&oldid=131235242 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=131157287 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=131158496 links http://www.bartleby.com/65/sn/SntoDom-city.htm This seems to be more of a historical context. http://countrystudies.us/dominican-republic/4.htm http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/46402.pdf 64.131.205.111 07:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] why not

that what the article says so why not put it, you making seem like there was only one reason; if you give one reason why can't other reason be put in

[edit] Couple of things

First, if you're going to be issuing warnings to people and utilizing the noticeboards, now might be the time to finally register an account. An anonymous IP is not the medium to conduct these things in.

Second, you really need to back off a little. Accusing everyone who edits the article of being a sock of Platanogenius is not constructive, and all your reverts are starting to come across as an attempt to WP:OWN the article. Most of these users are not socks, and you are increasing their frustration level a lot, so it's hard for them to be civil. In particular your handling of EdwinCasadoBaez is bordering on wikistalking. I understand you want to help the article, but you're not helping anyone if you end up getting reported for harassment yourself.--Rosicrucian 12:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets were found and confirmed to be sockpuppets a number of users were banned as well [6] . Although the platanogenius account came up inconclusive it did not mean that sockpuppets weren't used. I stayed on it and was proven right less than a day later. I haven't done anything on Edwin's page but tag him for warnings. Nothing else. In fact I was first harrassed on my talk page by him [7] after he made a number of personal attacks and was banned [8] . I have maintained an NPOV and will continue to do so. 64.131.205.111 08:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I've told him to wait out his ban, as it's upheld by two admins and there's not much I can do about it. He is having these outbursts because he is very frustrated with the continued reverting of the article. I imagine his wikistress is through the roof right now, and nothing is really served by baiting him until he blows up. And again, I would recommend that you get yourself a normal account. It gives people a face to deal with and a sense of accountability.--Rosicrucian 19:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] That wasn't the only article

the thing is there no fact on that, remember even you did a research...I did a research. I would done what u said but that wasn't the only article he did in...s/he did in Dominican founding father as well. I consider that vandalism more then anything, I looked he's history that all does try spread that. But hey good looks, hope forward working w/ you, I know me and you have different point of view but that reason i want work with... we not doing the same thing but we after the goal, so we need find not to agree, but to work. I like to say sorry if i ever got out hand anytime. I really think we making ground, making the article better...AvFnx 14:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I would like you help me asking for protection on the three founding fathers of DR, and have that statements in birth of nation taken out. Or at least show me about how do this thing. AvFnx 07:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do not threaten me, I do not scare

You threatened to have me blocked for editing a grammatical error in the Dominican Republic article. That is unfortunate. I will continue to fix grammatical errors when I find them because I don't like reading them. Good luck.

[edit] this article is clear...

This article http://www.grassrootshaiti.org/Events/Protest%20Terror%20in%20DR.html is clearly anti-Dominican, not going argue with the number, cause no one really knows. But can you please remove this article. Seem you in to this part of history can you find a article how the whole thing started cause Haiti killed some agents of Trujillo and Dominican on the border where tire of the cattle getting rob...and how Trujillo only had pay Haiti government for the act. AvFnx 07:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm not justifying it, that something that shouldn't happen. The reason my point is if you read what really happen it shows that both government are wrong, Trujillo for doing massacre, and the Haitian for not backing up it people. The robing cattle that how Trujillo tried tell the world that it was the civilian doing that. While he was promoting himself as Dominican defender. Let me make something clear, most the problem that DR has is cause Trujillo...people getting kill by the cops, like nothing happen, and so many more things is from the culture Trujillo/Balaguer did. I have lost family members in the hands of Trujillo, last thing i would wanna make him look good. The thing I don't about the article at the end, it doesn't Haiti should have a army but a militant group. AvFnx 16:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Personal Attacks

Where did i personally attack you, hey i know your game get everyone that stand in you way blocked. Well ima give you the pleasure to do you. Now no one going stand in you way turning the article to your Anti-Dominican point of view. Take that as personal attack if you want, but you start the whole thing calling me racist...when is you that have a racist point of view. I know what i am and what my people are, I don't need prove to the world nothing. If we done so much wrong to the Haitians tell you government and you people bring it on, we have the 2nd larges army in the Caribbean. Prepare for Haiti invalidation, this not Dominican of the 19th where we only defend our self, we more then ready take to new level. Run you propaganda, do you...cause people like you wikipiedia losing credibility...you wanted your personal attack there you got it. When Haiti was rich all they did was invade Dominican Republic, now that poor still invading Dominican Republic only now that peaceful. Remember something not Dominican fault Haiti people can't run there country...point blank if they don't like how they been people welcome them in Dominican Republic, they can go home. If i didn't like how USA treat me i would go home, I have a country, USA not my country...so i don't go out in the street burn the flag. And remember something Dominican flag has the bible and the cross that very disrespectful and we got treat them more rights then Dominican, feel lucky that we don't do like the Americans and send ya right home. If they refuges like some country tried say, like the government said how i take X ammount how much you going take...no one in the world said they would. Dominican don't get treat nice by our government what make you think Haitian are going too. Like i said the article all yours...Dominicano De Pura Cepa PrAAAAAAA AvFnx 00:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Interesting article with many citations

Saw this on a reverted edit. It's sources include UNICEF. Take a look at it. http://www.ecpat.net/eng/ecpat_inter/Publication/Other/English/Pdf_page/ecpat_sex_tourism_dom_rebublic.pdf 64.131.205.111 20:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Interesting perhaps, but considering who was trying to add it in I'm understandably hesitant to bring it back.--Rosicrucian 20:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Macho Camacho, Jr.

How you doing? You can add Macho Camacho Jr. again. I got to know both Sr. and Jr, but the link was written wrong "H%C3%A9ctor_Camacho_Jr." Instead use the accents used in the characters section of the editing page. In regard to Reggie Jackson, you can add the reference using this format <ref>[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0413960/bio Jackson Bio]</ref> which will add the footnote to the "Reference" section. Tony the Marine 19:40, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppet and such

I have come to a conclussion and I would like to know if you accept my agreement. Tony the Marine 01:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:EdwinCasadoBaez

If he has pledged not to use sockpuppets in the future and he behaves himself, I really don't care if he used sockpuppets or not. The evidence speaks for itself, anyway. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is inconsistent. If you want to convince someone that you should be allowed to edit under your old username, go ahead: Tony the Marine might be agreeable, if you agree to be on your best behavior going forward. You should realize that if EdwinCasadoBaez misbehaves again, he will be blocked. Try to move forward and improve the encyclopedia--that's what we're really here for, not to police each other's behavior. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About your request

I have requested that your User name be returned and that your talk page be unblocked. It should be done soon by the admins who blocked you. When I started in Wikipedia, I was a hot headed smart ass and I would get into arguments and trouble all of the time. I finally realized that if I wanted to stay in the project, things had to be Wikipeida way and not my way. I can't complain, because of my contributions I have received recognitions from the Government of Puerto Rico, the Pentagon, Congressman and so on. I have been featured in the news and have even traveled with all expenses paid. I'm not saying that this will happen to you, but if you take the project seriously, who knows. Tony the Marine 06:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About your User name

Your User name "YoSoyGuapo" was banned by the community not by an admin. What I suggest is that you start a new user page (ex.YoSoyGuapo2) and take it easy from there on. Tony the Marine 23:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Also add a tag identifying the account as an alternate (not sockpuppet) account to avoid any accusations of sockpuppetry in the future. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Also concerning this edit [9], WP:BAN states that "The Wikipedia community, making decisions according to appropriate community-designed policies with consensus support, or (more rarely) following consensus on the case itself. If no administrator is willing to unblock a user, the user can be considered banned", Tony is willing to give you a second chance so you are technically only indef blocked (confused? read WP:BLOCK) a indef block can be lifted at any moment, and last if you are given a second chace measure your actions and be constructive, if the way users are prortraying the Dominican Republic bothers you just stay away from those pages, maybe take your time to take a Puerto Rico related stub and raise it to Good Article, that will change your image with the community, after all we all have done mistakes. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I have asked Demon, to return your original User account, since he banned the account. This is with the understanding that if you violate our agreement you will be banned. You know, as I said before I have my faith in you and I believe that you can be constructive with positive contributions because I was the same way myslef in the begining. Tony the Marine 16:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
    • I did ask him, see: [10]. I'm going to ask him one more time. Tony the Marine 19:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I will allow him 24 hours to respond. If he doesn't then I'll unblock it myself. Tony the Marine 19:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I have unblocked you. I will hold you up to our agreement. Do not use this account anymore, delete it. Happy editing! Tony the Marine 02:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFC

Fill the space for the reason on the text below, then copy and paste (don't use the nowiki template) it on the article's talk page, a bot will take care of the rest.

{{RFCsoc|A dispute has been ongoing on this article about the inclution of some of the subject's homeruns in the article}}

[edit] Request for comment

Statements by editors previously involved in dispute
Add a brief explanation of the reason why you opened the RFC and what is your point of view in the matter, the other user should explain his in here as well
Comments

And presto! that's all it takes. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

You ask me to get your "YoSoyGuapo" unblocked and since I decided to give a chance and I did so. I have told you to discontinue the use of this one or it will be considered as a sockpuppet account and will forfeit our agreement. You have not complied. What is going on? Another thing, do not get into arguements or lengthly heated discussions, such as in Josh Gibson. If you can not have a civil discussion on subject, ask for mediation or arbitration. Policy is against canvansing. Instead of going to individual talk pages asking for opinions on a subject, you could go to a portal's talk page (in this case the Baseball Wikiportal) and post that there is a discussion about Josh Gibson going on, but you can not request help. If you do not comply by controling your temper and by seeking a mediator whenever a discussion arises you may be banned for good. Tony the Marine 23:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Everything is cool. I see want happened now. This is how you posted your opinion request: "Requesting your opinion on an article. There seems to be a movement to downplay minority achievements in a baseball." Wondering if you can give your opinion." You should have only posted "Requesting your opinion on an article" and left out the rest. That why no one could accuse you of canvansing. I myself didn't give an opinion on the issue because I'm not a pro on the matter and I think that the situation should go to a mediator. Take care. Tony the Marine 00:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Josh Gibson

Hi. While I agree that Negro League players don't get the recognition they deserve, I'm not much of a sports fan and I'm not familiar with the sources being discussed. I doubt if my input would be of much value. Thanks for asking me, though. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 16:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I read the article about Josh Gibson, get this ->, on a Blackberry, only to get enough interest to read it the second I got home. I am a fan of his since I was a kid, and read as much about him as the school library had at the time. The article on wikipedia hints at his prowess, but does not give him justice as the greatest home run hitter of all time. Altough I am working on researching several other articles at this time, I will come back to finish the citations on this one, HELL I have probibly read the books that were cited! Thanks for your enthusiasm, and attention to the memory of this man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artoftransformation (talk • contribs) 04:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was on block for a month. Did three edits. None of them being vandalism and i'm blocked for a year? a bit unfair"

Decline reason: "Clearly still being used by UnclePaco/Armyguy11. As such, all edits were in violation of WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK and therefore, vandalism. The editor known as UnclePaco and/or Armyguy11 is not permitted to edit Wikipedia while those accounts are blocked. — Yamla (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Also looking at this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AB&diff=191358200&oldid=191330337 . One edit was to User:B [11] the other two were constructive edits to [12] and [13] I haven't created any other accounts nor have I been editing. A check user showed that I haven't been editing. I only edit under one IP address which is confirmed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/UnclePaco 64.131.205.111 (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)