User talk:64.126.42.87

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That TALES OF FATIMA link worked fine... so why was it deleted? Pepso 22:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wmahan. 06:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Digital Deli Online. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --AbsolutDan (talk) 12:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding commercial or personal-website links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. --Nigel (Talk) 18:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notice of Proposed Deletion of The Digital Deli Online Article

You reposted yet another 'Notability' template on The Digital Deli Online. A previous editor had posted a similar notice until he'd apparently been satisfied that the article satisfied his concerns and removed it. If you have newer or more specific concerns about satisfying the 'notability' guidelines other than those that satisfied the other editors that reviewed it, please expand your objections or requirements to explain them so that I can rehabilitate or expand the article to your satisfaction. Your anonymous I.P. account would seem to raise it's own credibility issues. You'll forgive me if my initial impression is that this is simply vandalism, more personal, than in keeping with Wikipedia Guidelines. Any other editors are welcome to comment or concur with this impression. Dnyhagen 18:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I removed the proposed deletion template; it appears this anonymous user cut-and-pasted my reason for proposing OTRCAT for deletion onto The Digital Deli Online. I've now nominated OTRCAT for deletion. Wmahan. 20:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More warnings

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with OTRCAT. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of this article, you may comment on the article's AFD entry instead. Thank you.

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. Wmahan. 03:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Replied to your comment

I replied to your comment on my talk page. Wmahan. 15:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The same applies to me! --Nigel (Talk) 15:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)