User talk:64.12.116.12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address is that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL.

If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.


Contents

[edit] Your edit to USPTO registration examination

Your recent edit to USPTO registration examination (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Please Don't Vandalise (2nd Warning).

This message is concerning the article User talk:Pilotguy. Please stop adding nonsense or blanking articles on Wikipedia. This will be considered vandalism if it continues. Please use the sandbox for any further testing.

— Nathan (talk) / 02:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Alphachimp, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Betacommand 01:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during August 4, 2006 (UTC) to Seventh Day Slumber

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this IP address is shared by multiple users and you have not made any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning. Molerat 21:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Draicone (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 7 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. McPhail 02:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

If you are the owner of User:Nick81aku, please log in before you edit your user page. Otherwise, your edits could be mistaken for vandalism. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hani Hanjour. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:64.12.116.10. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ucanlookitup 02:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Yiffstar

Your recent edit to Yiffstar (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: test3

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 10, 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Yiffstar, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. The Count of Monte Cristo Parley 05:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Pretty Ricky

Your recent edit to Pretty Ricky (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 04:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Due to vandalism, you have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. — FireFox (talk) 15:26, 29 August 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Alphachimp, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Alphachimp, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I am protesting your blocking of NYScholar and that IP Address, which you did today without any warning whatsoever. I was in the midst of debating problems relating to the posting of images in Wikipedia that are registered copyrights and trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. You have referred to other Wikipedia users "educating" me on copyright and fair use. I find that particularly insulting. I have been discussing these issues in a fair and measured manner, providing education links for their and other Wikipedia users' benefit, yet they refuse to read and to respond to the actual language in the copyright notices posted on the Nobel Foundation website and the July 2006 US Copyright Law provision of "fair use" (an update to that provision). I have already linked to Wikpedia articles and policies relating to copyright and copyright infringement. I know what "fair use" provision of US Copyright Law is, and I have linked to that provision. I do not need further education on this matter. I am discussing it, and, as directed by Wikipedia, which tells its users to remove copyright-infringements from its articles and images, I attempted to alert people to these problems with the Nobel Medal image and images, first on the talk page, then via tags. People who have uploaded these images are the same people who have contacted administrators to block my IP address apparently. That is retailiation for my raising these questions. This is not an editing war; this is a serious debate. This is also not vandalism. It is not Wikipedia policy to block a user without first providing some kind of warning that blocking was being considered. I received no such warning. I am requesting that my IP address be unblocked immediately. I have no time to continue commenting on this matter anyway, and I was just writing that when my IP addresss was blocked and I could not post that. I do, however, want to be able to work on other articles (not related to this debate about the viability of posting images and photographs of Nobel medals). Your blocking my IP address prevents me from doing so. That is not fair. If you wish me not to discuss the Nobel medal issue any further, then let me know that. But do not block my IP address in this manner. That is uncalled for. And it also smacks of insider-influence of other parties in this debate, particularly the uploader(s) of such questionable images. The images were only removed temporarily (not only by me but by other Wikipedia users and administrators) while the issues were being debated; images of the Nobel medal and Nobel medals can be restored if they are unquestionably deemed within fair use in articles on Alfred Nobel, the Nobel Prize, and individual Nobel laureates. But that issue still, it seems to me, is not resolved clearly and convincingly. Nevertheless, I am requesting that you unblock my IP address, so that I can edit other articles that have nothing to do with this debate. -- 64.12.116.138 22:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) (NYScholar)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Alphachimp, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Tomato

Your recent edit to Tomato (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User page vandalism

On this edit of yours: Don't vandalize user pages (or anything else) again. -- Hoary 06:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hu12 22:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mount Hope High School (Rhode Island), has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Hope High School (Rhode Island). Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. ---- SonicAD (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page K. Rool on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Martinp23 12:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Pope John XXIII

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pope John XXIII. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --JFreeman (talk) 18:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for vandalism

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gwernol 23:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mass suicide on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 00:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lucille Ball

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lucille Ball on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --JFreeman (talk) 18:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Lucille Ball, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)