User talk:63.3.20.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 63.3.20.2, is registered to UUNET Technologies, Ashburn, VA, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thank you for experimenting with the page French Revolution on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized the Wikipedia article Scum, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Alex LaPointetalk 00:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --WS 01:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Woodstock Festival

Your recent edit to Woodstock Festival (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Lake Tanganyika

Your recent edit to Lake Tanganyika (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Planarian

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] February 2007

The recent edit you made to Gary Coleman constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 05:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Assassination market, you will be blocked from editing. Cynrin 01:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Bilal Skaf, you will be blocked from editing. Cynrin 01:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nishkid64 23:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Eddie Murphy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Grye 06:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Melanie Brown, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~~Eugene2x Sign here ☺ ~~ 03:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WRONG

Ask all historians its origin and they will tell you its IRISH becuase of its origins.Even if you say its anglicised it still does not mean its British because its associated nationality is Irish,therefore its ORIGIN IS IRISH that will be like taking an english name such as Black and translating it into Dubh in Irish and saying all this nonsense that it is Irish whereas it is English.

And I was not vandalising and the name isn't Cornish or Welch so GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!!!!!!!And if it was you who gave me a vandal warning give me a good explanation because the sources listed are crap and useless and so is the information. Odran Corcoran 09:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Corcoran

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Corcoran. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Selket Talk 20:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Selket Talk 20:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked for disruptive edits relating to Corcoran for a period of 24 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Selket Talk 20:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The IP address, 63.3.20.2, is registered to UUNET Technologies, Ashburn, VA and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking."

Decline reason: "No reason was given to believe the vandalism will stop. — Yamla 21:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] User talk:Real96

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:Real96, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 02:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, stop blanking pages, as you did at User:Betacommand. It is not helpful. Thanks, Iamunknown 05:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

You did it again at User talk:Betacommand. Please stop. Your contributions are considered vandalism. --Iamunknown 05:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I didn't blank any pages so I have no idea what your even talking about.

[edit] Melanie Brown

I'm not sure why you keep removing material from Wikipedia - but this is your first warning to stop. You have provided no reason for the removal, apparently using WP:IDONTLIKEIT, and given that the claim is correctly cited it should not be removed unless you give reason on the basis of Wikipedia Guidelines. --danielfolsom 04:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


well, other people have given reason and no mind has been paid to it. If you want it to be a good page then why put up any story the newspapers put out? If you want it to be a gossip/news page that even made up stories make it on then watch all the papers and put up everything, untrue, true, fake, mean, hateful, whatever stories the papers may print about her.

[edit] June 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Melanie Brown. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rockpocket 04:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hrs in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for harassing other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Rockpocket 05:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

. Rockpocket 05:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

With regard to your comments on User talk:69.156.54.192: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Rimmers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ratiocinate (t • c) 04:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Do not remove user warnings from your talk page, as it is considered vandalism. Thank you. --Ratiocinate (t • c) 04:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Everything here is "considered vandalism". Someone could pick their nose and that would be vandalism too.

[edit] Yudonia

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Yudonia, you will be blocked from editing. --Footballrocks41237 17:27, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Attention

Hey, jerk, stop vandalizing the pages because I'm getting nailed for your stuff. I would also like to request account creation cause I can't do it myself, and some guy removed my auto/unblock request or something. Sincerely, Another person using the IP 63.3.20.2, alright?

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

chronic userpage vandalism

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- nat.utoronto 18:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "See my message above."

Decline reason: "This IP has been used abusively and cannot be unblocked. However, it is only set to block anonymous users and logged in editors are permitted to edit. If you would like to request an account, you may email unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. — B (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


[edit] AfD nomination of List of Hot 100 (U.S.) chart achievements and trivia

An editor has nominated List of Hot 100 (U.S.) chart achievements and trivia, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hot 100 (U.S.) chart achievements and trivia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lena Horne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat 23:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flame scallop, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AntHolnes (talk) 02:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 17:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Spice Girls, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. faithless (speak) 08:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Steven Kellogg. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Vishnava talk 18:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Steven Kellogg. Vishnava talk 18:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC),

I did not make an edit to the Spice Girls page about them splitting up. If that happened, the edit was made by someone else. JLKTENNIS43 (talk)