User talk:63.3.11.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, an3.rdu6.da.uu.net, is registered to UUNET Technologies, Inc., an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] December 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page User:TheDOC1958 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. alphachimp. 17:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Curtis Clark 18:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Interesting. It appears you are User:Fractaloctal not signed in. So you want to both add spam links to juniper articles and create spelling inconsistencies in Dobermann. It's becoming hard for me to assume good faith.--Curtis Clark 18:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

you ASS ume to much 63.3.11.2 18:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Evidently.--Curtis Clark 22:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dobermann

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 19:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 19:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:ENGVAR.Articles should use the same dialect throughout. Each article should have uniform spelling and not a haphazard mix of different spellings. Since the article is referenced by AKC and the The Doberman Pinscher Club of America it is NOT vandalizing! 63.3.11.2 19:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

The recent edit you made to Joseph Conrad constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in contributing to the project, see the Introduction. However, please do not continue to vandalize pages. Thanks – Qxz 22:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Onorem 22:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Onorem 23:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please stop adding nonsense to pages like you did with the Zeus article. Thank you. Rboesen 21:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Cuban Missile Crisis, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 01:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Professional Hydraulics, you will be blocked from editing. JBEvans 00:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William M. Tweed, you will be blocked from editing. —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb ) 01:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tangram, you will be blocked from editing.

∴ here…♠ 21:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

See also reference to past abuse from this IP at Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Planetary_Chaos ∴ here…♠ 21:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tangram

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 22:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fascism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pursey Talk | Contribs 00:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tommy Bowden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kat, Queen of Typos 05:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Óscar Arias, you will be blocked from editing. Notmyrealname 21:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rock Hill, South Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Connor401 00:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Poodle, you will be blocked from editing. Gawaxay (talk • contribs • count) 16:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Face. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Face, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Shenandoah Valley Governor's School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blair - Speak to me 23:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Shenandoah Valley Governor's School, you will be blocked from editing. Blair - Speak to me 23:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 666 (number). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. UnfriendlyFire 20:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Civil rights movement, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 01:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 01:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Talk:Rilla of Ingleside worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rgoodermote  01:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Winchester rifle, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Winchester rifle was changed by 63.3.11.2 (u) (t) deleting 18127 characters on 2008-03-16T03:19:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Stephanie Wilson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Guppy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —Animum (talk) 01:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)