User talk:63.3.1.129

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, an2.det15.da.uu.net, is registered to UUNET Technologies Inc., an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 63.3.1.1.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/63.3.1.1 for evidence.

Account information: block logcurrent autoblockseditslogs


This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Contents

[edit] Related IPs

[edit] Warnings

[edit] July 2007

[edit] Edit Reverted

Thank you for your recent contributions to Wikipedia; I've seen your edits before under five different IP numbers. (63.3.69.136 - 63.3.69.133 - 63.3.69.6 - 63.3.1.1 - 63.3.1.129 ...Those interested in whether the shared IP makes a difference as far vandalism goes, might look at the edits that were made with the other IP numbers this person uses.) I know that you sockpuppet on Wikipedia, but I'd like to assume good faith with your edits lately. With this in mind, I'm going to leave you some constructive information...

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 63.3.1.129). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. If your 'shared id's' are causing confusion here on Wikipedia, it would be prudent to have a specific account to rule out that problem.

I noticed that the edit you made to the article titled Richard Marx was incorrect. I'm sure that this was just an mistaken error, but it was reverted and changed back to the original edit. Fact checking is an important part of editing on Wikipedia.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

--Candy156sweet 16:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. If possible, please use an email address issued by your ISP or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. We apologize for any inconvenience.

[edit] August 2007

...To whom it may concern, Absolutely NONE of these edits are mine! The only edits/additions I have ever contributed are ones regarding musical artists. Please check into this matter as there is certainly no reason for me to be blocked from editing. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.1.129 (talkcontribs) 22:44, August 4, 2007

I believe that the evidence speaks for itself. --Candy156sweet 05:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

This is your only warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Dinosaur King, you will be blocked from editing. Rjd0060 23:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Black Locust, you will be blocked from editing. --Coffee and TV 20:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Seriously, 63.3.1.129, please stop vandalizing articles. You have been warned several times now. Any more unconstructive edits from your account, like you did to Black locust, will probably get you blocked from editing. ArielGold 20:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Public holidays in Cuba‎, you will be blocked from editing. --Candy156sweet 03:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sutton Hoo, you will be blocked from editing. --Candy156sweet 10:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:OR and WP:SOAP

Please read both of the above Wikipedia policies before continuing to edit in a disruptive manner. Thank you. JPG-GR 18:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to James Bradley, you will be blocked from editing. DéRahier 00:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Great Lakes, you will be blocked from editing. --Candy156sweet 18:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of three months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case 18:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Drag (physics) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --mustafarox (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Little Rock Nine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 22:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I'm not surprised

I see that the editor with the dynamic IP is back to nonsense editing with his sockpuppet accounts. Wasn't enough that you were caught once right? --Candy156sweet (talk) 23:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Additional Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List_of_Naruto_villains. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --04:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Candy156sweet (talk)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Manifest_Destiny, you will be blocked from editing. --Candy156sweet (talk) 17:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The_Princess_Bride, you will be blocked from editing. --Candy156sweet (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rock cycle, you will be blocked from editing. Taroaldo (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Battle of Fredericksburg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. iridescent 00:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Princess Sarah has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. iridescent 22:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)