User talk:63.215.27.201

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] December 2006

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Hello. Please don't make massive changes and deletions to articles as you did to Ptolemaic Egypt without discussing your changes on the article's talk page and citing reliable sources. You might also want to work on proper formatting so your edits are not construed as vandalism. Thanks. — [zɪʔɾɪdəʰ] · 04:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Do not create non-existant links like you did with Grandmaster Caz. Ronbo76 14:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

hwat links are you refering to?
I share a internet connection with numerous users so perhaps the "egypt" edit was someone elses doing. I know nothing about Eygpt nor do I pretend to.
A note hoewever on the undo edit. The term "religious people" is extremely vague. What exactly is a religious person? Someone who is pious or an actual member of the clergy? If the former than the term civilian should suffice. If the latter definition is being used than the term clergy would be more approriate and would need reliable and verifiable support via external sources that are obviously not purely subjective or politically motivated. There is great controversy over who the KLA where and what they did. As such, support for claims as to their conduct in the war must be fair and balanced and not rely on blantly pro-Serb or pro-Albanian sources such as the Serbian orthodox church or hearsay from former KLA members. While there is some evidence of individual members attacking non-combatants there is absolutely no substantiated proof that the KLA as an organization targeted non-combatants the way Serbian forces did. Human rights watch verifies this as does the Hague.

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Regarding your edit to User talk:KosMetfan (diff.): Please, do not remove text from users' talk pages. - Best regards, Evv 16:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please, do not add nonsense to the user talk page either (diff.). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Evv 03:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

[edit] Level 3 Warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to David Ortiz, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vic226 04:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to Dodo. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 21:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to AlphaSmart. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 21:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

[edit] Level 3 Warning

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did to Carrier pigeon, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Indon (reply) — 21:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

[edit] Level 4 Warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Greenland, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Valentinian T / C 21:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Demashita! Powerpuff Girls Z. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 18:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Jespinos 22:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 1 Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Guinnog 01:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Quisqueyanos valientes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jesse Viviano 07:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to John F. Kennedy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Hdt83 Chat 00:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 3 Warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dragonite, you will be blocked from editing. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 22:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 4 Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -Jeske (v^_^v) 22:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Level 2 Warning

Yanmega was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 22:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BLOCKED

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Bucketsofg 22:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

[edit] Level 4 Warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Citi Field, you will be blocked from editing. V-train 21:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cell cycle, you will be blocked from editing. Forluvoft (talk) 01:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Kat DeLuna. Thank you. NrDg 20:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kat DeLuna. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The references you use need to be REAL references. Not invented ones that just look good in the article. They must really exist. NrDg 20:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Kat DeLuna, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The references you use need to be REAL references. Not invented ones that just look good in the article. They must really exist. NrDg 16:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

OK I found a REAL reference to support the addition factoid and fixed the cite in the article. Next time you add references, actually VERIFY that they work. --NrDg 16:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Art of ancient Egypt, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Art of ancient Egypt was changed by 63.215.27.201 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-23T23:33:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mike Alstott has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wilma Rudolph, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wilma Rudolph was changed by 63.215.27.201 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-11T02:04:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wilma Rudolph, you will be blocked from editing. Myasuda (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sickle-cell disease has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 00:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)