User talk:63.215.26.146

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Aircrew member. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. AirOdyssey (Talk) 01:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Forward basing. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. TerriersFan 22:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 15:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blizzard Entertainment, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blizzard Entertainment was changed by 63.215.26.146 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-30T07:57:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Airline holding comapnies navigation box

I posted this message to User talk:63.215.26.148 last night, but since you refuse to get an account and your dynamic IP address has changed again, you apparently didn't see it. I'm posting it here too.

I've removed your second third attempt at an airline holding companies navigation box from Trans World Corporation. For one, something like this should be a template, not built within the article page. Second, we already have Category:Airline holding companies which effectively does the same thing. Please join the discussion about this template at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines#Regional and Mainline Airline Holding Companies of the United States before attempting to recreate this again. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 16:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll convert it to a template tonight. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Grand !

63.215.26.146 (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] P.S.

Was trying to come up with a way of not cluttering the opreational units of the organizations so it is more legible and readable without being overwhelming for the lay reader. Also I am going to be contributing to the airline brand section with Southern Skyways 63.215.26.146 (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Going to mention too

We already discussed having IATA codes in the templates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines after you added them to {{Navbox Airlines of the United States}} and the consensus was that they shouldn't be there. Historians should know better than to need codes to find what they're looking for in a navigation box. Let the article deal with that. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Well suggest to your cadre that to adequately trace history...of airlines it may need to be reevaluated.

Not for the section about the airline box but for the section pertainging to airline holding companies.... history is very imporatant especially in this day and age of airline mergers. That is unless you have something against being able to trace airline history?

Glad you are discussing these things

63.215.26.146 (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I think the same holds for both {{Navbox Airlines of the United States}} and {{Airline holding companies of the United States}}. Adding the airline's IATA code to the airline listings doesn't help at all. It's not up to the navigation boxes to contain history, that should be in the articles themselves. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 01:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)