User talk:63.169.104.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi.

Please don't blank other people's user pages. It's not nice and will get you your editing privileges revoked. Also, I suggest you create a user name and log in before making edits that others may find controversial.

Regards,

UninvitedCompany 22:04, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hello, Please tell the same thing to the others who constantly edit and delete entire passages as well. be fair man. and on another point, there is no harm in controversy, considering boyer and his friends harrass others that do not agree with them. there is no requirement to create user names and logs as this is a free encyclopedia avaliable to all. was your user page deleted? or was someone else's? IP's can be used by different peoples, in case you do not know that. why do you use the user name univited company?

Contents

[edit] List of surrealist poets

Hi. A number of the people you knocked off the List of surrealist poets appear to be surrealist poets, including Mary Low, whether or not she is a communist. Please do not damage Wikipedia whilst fighting with Daniel Boyers. The List of surrealist poets is just that: a list. Not a selected list. You are wrong to say too many substantial gaps to consider Mary Low. There may well be substantial gaps. Mary's omission only makes them wider, and does not ameliorate them. Your time would perhaps be better spent in filling the gaps, than fighting, but YMMV. Whatever, please take your RV war to talk:List of surrealist poets --Tagishsimon Dear Tagishsimon, that user with the IP Address 63.169.104.2 does have the right to edit, as do you and Dan Boyer.

[edit] Surrealist Movement in the United States

What's going on? Why did you delete the bulk of the article's text? Please use the talk page to discuss your concerns about the article's content instead of using obscure edit summaries like "vested interest"; that's precisely what talk pages are for. Also, always explain the reason for a revert, or you may find your changes reverted back.
If no word is forthcoming from you about this matter, I will undo your most recent changes. You can reply here, use the article's talk page, or use my talk page. --Ardonik.talk() 22:31, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

This is my second attempt to reach you. You have reverted a change to the article again. I won't revert back if you reply. Please do so! If you make no attempt at all to reach consensus, your edits may be considered to be vandalism. --Ardonik.talk() 21:54, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)
Hi. I received your message on my talk page, and posted a lengthy reply there. The gist of it is that I'm glad you're finally willing to talk to us, and that I'll retract the harsh things I said about you if you can finally justify the unilateral (I hate that word, but it's appropriate here) actions you've taken in Surrealist Movement in the United States. I'm asking both you and Daniel Boyer to meet me at the article's talk page. --Ardonik.talk() 18:26, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Consesus

I am trying to reach consensus with everyone here. I also provided my response on your talk page as you requested. Reggae is Surrealism? Can you prove that?

Try actually reading the article. It nowhere states that reggae is surrealism, merely that there has been analysis of reggae from a surrealist perspective. Thus there is no need to prove something that was never stated. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:39, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

If you continue to remove material from article and then revert them when others replace the material against general consensus, you may be banned from editing this site. See Wikipedia:Vandalism and Wikipedia:Bans and blocks for detailed policy information. BCorr|Брайен 17:46, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Bcorr

Let the record show that my last edit did not remove nothing! I added the removed information back and kept the newly added information on there. I feel an unjust lynching coming on!

[edit] Three Reverts

You have violated Wikipedia policy by reverting the same page three times in a 24 hour period. I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Three revert rule, and you have been warned. Any further, flagrant policy violations and you may be blocked from editing. ugen64 04:06, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] 63.169.104.2 will comply

I will comply with the policy rules. I will only edit this page within the three revert rule, but if it is changed,I will edit it back the next day,either way, I will edit it back within policy rules.

[edit] Dispute edits

Do not remove "disputed" tag from an article if it is clear that the dispute is still ongoing and has not been resolved in the talk page. Thanks. -- Infrogmation 18:09, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Haiti. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BlackBear 00:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Haiti, you will be blocked from editing. BrokenSphere 00:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 17 May 2007 to Oxford English Dictionary

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. xC | ☎ 17:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Dude squares are boring, jeez.

[edit] Regarding edits made 17 May 2007 to Five-card stud

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. xC | ☎ 18:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 17 May 2007 to Amusement park

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. xC | ☎ 19:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to 1929 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to About 30 articles, you will be blocked from editing. --barneca (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] More vandalism

Can you please stop making joke edits? It is a real pain to go through and revert them all. Thanks. --Guinnog 17:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Sorry for the trouble.

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to 1992. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Thank you. Nevermorestr 19:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Georgewilliamherbert 19:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Witchcraft, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan 18:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wadi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan 18:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pliocene, you will be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan 18:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ice age, you will be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan 18:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] September 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to General Admiral, you will be blocked from editing. Smalljim 18:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

FUCK YOU

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

ugen64 18:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Ship. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Maralia 22:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nouméa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Maralia 22:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Belgian Congo, you will be blocked from editing. Maralia 22:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Poverty threshold, you will be blocked from editing. Maralia 22:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)