Talk:62 Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I notice this has been removed:

A leading member of the 62 Group was Harry Bidney, a convicted child molester and owner of the Limbo club in Soho.

Whereas it seems to be a valid piece of information. Bidney had an obituary published in Searchlight, so it seems that he was a 'leading member'. Unless the veracity of this information be disproven, I shall re-insert it (without the POV additions from 195.93.21.38. 80.255 11:57, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mosley's group and suggestions of violence

I removed this sentance, " no suggestion was made that Mosley's organisation who were the main victims of 62 Group attacks indulged in any violence except in defence of their own meetings" As whether it is true or not that they did indulge in violence (one suspects it is), the point is that members of the 62 group and others did make this sugestion.--JK the unwise 17:36, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It's all fine and NPOV to report contradictory suggestions. I think it deserves to be mentioned that Mosley's group did claim the above, so long as the claim is properly attributed. It's impossible to ajudge the truth of it; I daresay both sides were responsible for violence at various times. 80.255 20:09, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

A sentance like "However, Mosleys groups denied that they indulged in violence except in defence of their meetings" would be ok though it seems redundent since their is allready a sentence that notes that members of the far-right accused the 62 Group of starting the violence. The problem with the last sentance is that it reports that no one made the suggestion that Mosely's group was involved in violence, which is wroung.--JK the unwise 11:06, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)