User talk:62.77.181.16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Henry M. Jackson

Please read the talk page before making further edits. Your wholesale blankings have been vetted by at least 4 separate unrelated editors thanks to a requests for comment process. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I will edit anyway I see fit, you speak of POV but how a neo-con apologist can have any credibility in NPOV is beyond me. Please consider this channel of communication closed and don't harass or be disruptive towards me again.
So, personal attacks is the route you choose to go, got it. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Assumptions are the realm of the cynic and the ignorant, I deal in realities, let me re-iterate if you did not understand me before, this channel of communication is closed.
You seem to assume a lot about fellow editors. As talk pages are the only lines of communication available on a Wiki, you certainly have no ability to close it. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Assumptions are the realm of the cynic and the ignorant.
  • I deal in realities.
  • Let me re-iterate if you did not understand me before, this channel of communication is closed. 62.77.181.16 11:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
So you deal in realities? I expect to see you reverting yourself at the Jackson page, then, as you removed a lot of reality. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Maybe you should take the line "this channel of communication is closed" as a metaphor for "I have no interest in debating with those whom I know to be ignorant and misguided" but I was doing my utmost not to get personal, you did drag it out of me however. Like I told you (you seem to have to be told a lot of things twice) I never assume, I deal in realities, you may say they are perceived realities, however I know what is real and what is not. Please desist from replying to me as I have no reason to engage in communication with the likes of you. 62.77.181.16 11:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
You actually got personal in your first response, but you seem to be assuming quite a bit about your fellow editors as well as assuming incorrect things about the reality of Scoop's legacy. Please desist from making personal attacks (see WP:CIVIL) and point-of-view editing (see WP:NPOV) before this has to go to a different avenue. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Maybe I gave your intellect too much credit. You in fact, have to be told three times. THIS CHANNEL OF COMMUNICATION IS CLOSED. Comprendo. 62.77.181.16 12:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
No, you haven't given me enough. I am simply ignoring your unnecessary proclamations. Your continued violations of WP:CIVIL at the Jackson talk page as well as here may have to be dealt with if they are not ceased. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


Blah, blah, blah....., Do what you need to do boy. 62.77.181.16 13:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Henry M. Jackson

Your recent edit to Henry M. Jackson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Agents of ignorance?"

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption.

Please, seriously, stop. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No Personal Attacks

Regarding edits such as these: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Paul Cyr 03:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing Warnings

Regarding edits such as this: [6], Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Paul Cyr 03:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Content Disputes

Regarding comments that you will not discuss a dispute while continuing to push your POV, please read WP:DR for the proper way to resolve a dispute. Simply editing an article to meet your views and refusing to properly discuss the matter is not appropriate and can be considered vandalism. Paul Cyr 03:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


Memo to Paul Cyr, quit your bumbling ramblings, the references you cite as examples are in no way personal and exemplify my dealing with the real issues so I suggest you try and analyse situations a little more efficiently rather than engaging in a witch-hunt of the innocent. Do your job and go after the real personally offensive vandals with no interest in rational debate and who only serve to disrupt, not those interested in rational debate like myself. Hurry along now....
Please read WP:CIVIL. If you continue to be rude and disruptive, you will be blocked from editing. Paul Cyr 16:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Namechecking

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Namechecking, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Namechecking. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

[edit] Blocked

I've blocked this IP address for a month, see User talk:Bazzajf. --ajn (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Now two months, due to sockpuppet use to evade block. --ajn (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/8bitJake

This case is closed and the result has been published at the link above. 8bitjake is banned from editing articles about poltical figures from Washington State, and he is placed on Probation. These remedies also apply to Bazzajf and 62.77.181.16.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 20:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi Bazzajf!

To edit, please log in.

Due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network, editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please see here. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Syrthiss 13:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] County Londonderry

Please stop altering references to County Londonderry to County Derry. There is no official county called County Derry, and never has been. The official name of the county, and accepted name on Wikipedia, is County Londonderry. See WP:IMOS. The accepted setup on Wikipedia is to use Londonderry for the county and Derry for the city. Consistent alteration to this is considered POV pushing and vandalism. Oh and stop accusing me of political posturing, if you'd like to check my edits you'll find they are actually what could be construed as "political posturing" for both unionist and republican ideals dependant on your POV. I follow neither POVs and simply assist in making Wikipedia neutral and adhere to the policies and guidelines within Wikipedia. Ben W Bell talk 09:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding this edit [7]. You will apologise for and remove that comment immediately or face a block for personal attacks. I am not a "sectarian oaf", "ignorant buffoon" or "political postur(er)". I an upholding Wikipedia policies in the naming of places in Northern Ireland. The accepted compromise on Wikipedia is to call the county Londonderry and the city Derry as per WP:IMOS. Ben W Bell talk 09:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.Ben W Bell talk 09:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)