User talk:62.64.213.157

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In fact you are a disgrace to Wikipedia, a disgrace to the idea of free speech, a disgrace to good editing, and you are in breach of the 3RR. GROW UP QUICKLY, PLEASE. 62.64.213.157 (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:3RR does not apply to vandalism. You should get to know that. Meanwhile, if you're not going to use this talk page for its intended purpose, I will protect it, and feel quite justified because free speech does NOT apply to Wikipedia. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 15:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Deaths in 2008. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Stifle (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Stifle - If you are following Rodhullandemu's lead and suggesting this is a sock puppet account of mine, I will point out to you what I pointed out to him - this is just someone who happens to agree with me. Therefore you cannot accuse him or her of engaging in an edit war, as he or she has only reverted Rodhullandemu's edit once. I will make the same offer to you that I made to him - I am happy to sign out and post anonymously so that my PC's IP address will display. You will then see that it is NOT the same as this user's. Smurfmeister (talk) 08:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)