User talk:62.60.98.134

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Oyster card on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Martinp23 11:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of proposed Jack the Ripper suspects on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Matteo 07:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edits to The Blair Witch Project

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Blair Witch Project. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 19:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Skepta

Your recent edit to Skepta (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism on the articles : Jagathy Sreekumar‎ and Mammootty

Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.-- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 11:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] RE:1951

Hello, The DoB of Mammootty is 1953 in the article. It is also categorised under 1953 births. If you feel that the DoB is wrong, please provide valid citations to prove your claim. Dont change the DoB with out providing proper citations.

The actor's DoB is stated as 7th September 1953 in many sites. Moreover it is given as 1953 in IMDB profile also. See this also: [1] . Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 05:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello, please provide citations to your claim. I repeat; " The actor's DoB is stated as 7th September 1953 in many sites. " You can google it out. You may be correct, that your father was his classmate. How can a reader believe your words. Doesnt it sounds childish ?? Any ways, since, the DOB is reflected as 1953, and is quoted to as said by him, we have no other go. Hope this will pacify you. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 10:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Art, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ck lostsword•T•C 15:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Newstopia

You are in danger of violating Wikipedia's three revert rules. Please stop adding the same review of Newstopia to its external links as it is not notable. Wikipedia rarely if ever uses blogs as sources/references/links. If you honestly think it deserves to be used then say why on Wikipedia's talk page. DO NOT ADD IT AGAIN! Thank you, Rothery 13:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC).


[edit] Your edit to the "Henna" article

The website you added as a link to the "henna" article is made up almost entirely of images copied without permission from other websites. This violates international and domestic copyright law and the Wikipedia terms of use. The link has been removed. Please donot repost it.

If the site referenced in the link is yours, you would be wise to remove the images from the website immediately because the owners of the images have been notified and can be expected fo file formal infringement complaints with the site's service provider. 49oxen (talk) 21:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paternoster

Please use an edit summary if you delete content from an article. If nobody can tell why you deleted it, your action will probably be considered vandalism. Moyabrit (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Shaparak Khorsandi do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bwordpress\.com' (link(s): http://thevoidcomedy.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/interview-shappi-khorsandi/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] Your second edit to the "Henna" article

You reposted a link to the same site with the same illegally copied images and once again the link has been removed with an admonition about posting links to illegal content. Do not post content that violates copyright law or the Wikipedia terms of use.

And once again you are advised that if you are the owner of the site that you would be wise to remove the images that are not yours because the owners will be notified and can be expected to file infringement complaints with your service provider and get your site shut down again. 49oxen (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

[edit] May 9th 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Hedgehog. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Master Runner (Talk/Contribs) 04:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Hedgehog.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- kainaw™ 04:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rainforest Schmainforest. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Channel ®   11:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)