User talk:62.253.219.131

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

School IP address Attention:

This host, a131.thegrid.org.uk, is registered to Hemel Hempstead School and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] October 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:22, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lectonar 14:47, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lectonar 14:52, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2 Nov 2005

A tag has been placed on your article Jon Shaxted, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Jon Shaxted is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Jon Shaxted. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. PJM 12:27, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] November 3

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ixfd64 10:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 4 November 2005

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jcw69 10:38, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jcw69 10:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for three days for repeated vandalism. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked again. Fredrik | talk 12:14, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Kanji. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 10:22, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for a week

Due to repeated vandalism, this IP has been blocked for one week. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nature of IP

This IP has been stated on the Wikipedia HelpDesk mailing list as being from a school. I would therefore ask any moderators blocking it to keep to relatively short-term blocks only. - Andre Engels 20:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

This IP does indeed belong to Hemel Hempstead School. The amount of vandalism that occurs from this IP every day is incredible, but much seems to be reverted by the IP itself. I would still doubt the value of contributions from this IP. Molerat 16:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hey, school, learn about Wiki purges

Wikipedia has no policies, applied consistently. All the admins on en-l openly admit counting any shred of persanal fairness as mattering less than developing Wikipedia as they wish. Blocking of only 1 side when 2 sides have done exactly the same thing that the block is supposed to have been for, is routine. It's what happened to me too, and claiming to have any rights against a biased 2-day block actually was the offence that got me permablocked, after only 5 weeks' membership. Look at all these: a voice from within Wikipedia's own system describes how the ArbCom and dispute resolution systems are rigged with discretionary catch-alls that always enable admin to win http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-June/024230.html on how force of group numbers dictates Wikipedia pages's content http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-July/025936.html this is actually called "don't bother reporting abusive admins" http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-July/025921.html I was wary of how the umpiring of pages the whole world can fight over could possibly work well, but I was drawn into Wikipedia by a friend who was briefly (and no longer is, already!) having good experiences with sharing his medical concerns on a couple of pages on medical subjects. Here are 2 administrators saying to me http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-August/027816.html http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-August/027817.html saying "You are not entitled to anything" and "Wikipedia is not a democracy." On the nature of Wikipedia: http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-July/025583.html http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/08/322087.html http://spectrum-fairness.blog.co.uk/ tag "Wikipedia" messages of support: "some of the people on there do seem pretty sarcastic and bullying .... some of the right-wingers on there seem to think mentioning anything negative but factual about Reagan or Bush constitutes bias and there do seem to be some nasty characters on there." - from Aspievision, http://s13.invisionfree.com/aspievision/index.php "You are not the only one who has had problems with Wikipedia taking sides in a dispute, and being blatantly unfair to the other side without even giving them a chance to defend themselves." from FAMSecretSociety, a Yahoo group " of late I've noticed that some independent contributions have been either radically edited or censored. I've not had time to check articles on 9/11, the London Bombings, the assault on Falluja etc, but judging from the way content was edited promptly out of articles on SSRIs, schizophrenia and Asperger's, there definitely seem to be operatives in place ready to clamp down on anything that may cast doubt on establishment canards." from Medialens, http://www.medialens.org/board/ 193.39.159.3 12:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] November 23, 2005

This message is regarding the page Theory X and theory Y. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 09:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doc ask? 10:16, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doc ask? 10:18, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Doc ask? 10:43, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2006

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- Alf melmac 15:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Arsenal F.C.. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Alf melmac 15:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the page Hardware, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alf melmac 12:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Alf melmac 12:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The user still vandalizes. --Iirolaiho 13:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
This user is still vandalizing. --CopperMurdoch 14:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Qwghlm 13:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake. I thought you had removed it. Qwghlm 13:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Vsmith 14:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 19 January 2006

Concerning your edit to Potato, even though it was a minor case, because of the history vandalism from this address, this will be your only warning today. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 14:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the page Muammar al-Qaddafi, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 15:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with the page Muammar al-Qaddafi on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --james °o 15:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2006

[edit] March 3, 2006

This is your only warning. Your recent vandalism is sufficiently serious enough to warrant a block. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --MJ(☎|@|C) 14:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ixfd64 09:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
    You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
    Haukur 09:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 10:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Cactus.man ✍ 14:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Thanks for experimenting with the page Gospel of John on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Ugur Basak 13:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Molerat 21:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  1. Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Geography. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 14:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. Thanks for experimenting with the page Richard Pingram on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 14:52, 17 March 2006 (UTC)