User talk:62.25.106.209

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 62.25.106.209, is registered to Energis plc, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This IP address is part of the range 62.25.96.0 - 62.25.111.255 owned by Energis plc. It is regularly used by employees and customers of that company, and by bona fide editors, of whom User:Nick Boulevard is one, as well as by vandals, as evidenced below.

If you would only log in, we could thank you for the editing you've done to bring Gospel of Barnabas up to scratch. --Wetman 11:10, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am echoing Wetman's thoughts. Get an account. Your edits are great. Refdoc 12:08, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I see others have beaten me to it in congratulating you on your work. Get an account or don't, but keep it up! - Mustafaa 20:31, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Re: Jack Silver. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - BanyanTree 16:04, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as John England, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! – Ryan Delaney talk 14:04, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi. Your edit was factually incorrect, therefore, I undid it. Prime Minister of Israel Ariel Sharon unequivocally condemned Natan-Zada's actions, calling them "a reprehensible act by a bloodthirsty Jewish terrorist" Thanks. El_C 17:55, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Israel's definition of terrorism

You deleted my amendment regarding Israel's definition of terrorism on the page about Zionist terrorism, claiming that it was factually incorrect. My edit explained that Israeli law does not classify Jewish Israelis who commit terrorist acts as terrorists, nor any victims of Jewish Israeli-acts of terror as victims of terrorism. You think and claim that this is factually incorrect because Ariel Sharon condemned the particular act in question as a "terrorist" act. Please read the following BBC article to learn why you do not seem to understand the difference between national law and political statements: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4198754.stm - I look forward to seeing you restore my edits very quickly. And start getting your "facts" right. 62.25.106.209 18:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

I understand the difference, I just misread that; thanks for the correction. I restored your addition. El_C 18:10, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Regarding your edits on Jat it is not correct that Jats are mostly Muslims. burdak 11:55, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Trevor MacInnis(Talk | Contribs) 15:41, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Try saying what the "nonsense" is specifically before making unsubstantiated accusations here. How very arrogant of you. 86.17.208.173 22:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
    • You ignore the definition of "nonsense" in the Wiki context: anything someone with an account doesn't like.

[edit] test

meh

[edit] December 21, 2005

This message is regarding the page Secret Santa. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- MisterHand 13:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Neoplatonism

Hey 62, could you tell us how much of the material you recently added to Neoplatonism is copyrighted text by so-and-so published by Routledge, and how much is your own work? I think there's no problem using a direct quotation if it's short, properly cited, and necessary – and it must be set off with quotation marks! (inverted commas) Best, QuartierLatin1968 Image:Flag of Anarcho syndicalism.svg 03:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Can you point out which of your edits were taken wholesale from other people's work? Jkelly 22:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Big Brother (Magazine) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Liface 01:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Epsilon. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

specific edit reference | User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 10:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Info on Edits made using this IP address

Unfortunately you can see that there is a mixture of comments here, mainly because this IP address is covered by a number of people under Energis, which is a British Government-department contractor.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User:Mjk2357, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Lo2u 13:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Death worship

This subject has nothing to do with simple veneration or worship of the dead (as opposed to accusations of glorification of death as something positive in itself). Please don't add irrelevant material to this article.... AnonMoos 15:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Surrealism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KOS | talk 14:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peoples' Global Action

Hi, could you reply to my comments on the Peoples' Action talk page concerning the disputed paragraph? Thanks, Addhoc 18:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Wayne Rooney

Your recent edit to Wayne Rooney (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 15:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About Racism

Your family on this link below? Whites are all monsters? You can live with these people, if you want. Just let me live with the people I prefer. That's fair isn't it? http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/wanted.html

[edit] Lindsay Lohan

Thank you for your edit to this article. Your changes have been reverted for two reasons: one, per the Wikipedia Manual of style, only country of origin and/or citizenship should go in the lead paragraph; two, to refer to Ms. Lohan as Irish-American without also mentioning Italian-American is inaccurate. Please feel free to write me if you have any questions. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 13:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Mr. T

Your recent edit to Mr. T (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] U2

What do you have against describing the band as being Irish? Please discuss in talk before making any more of these edits. Thanks. --Guinnog 12:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

What I am against is countless contributors who insist that a band made up of two Irish and two Brits must always be referred to using the phrase "Irish band U2" but are constantly trying to find ways not to say "British" in The Edge and Clayton's articles. Please explain why, in an article about a musician, you MUST say that his band is Irish. It's irrelevant - the fact is stated in the U2 article. You have inconsistent standards. Leave your politics at the door. 195.92.40.49 12:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
PS If of a person you are not allowed to say (paraphrasing) "British born in Britain" why are you allowed to say of U2 "Irish formed in Ireland"? Is there a minimum quota for the term?
Irrespective of the members nationality, the band (singular entity) is Irish. It's all been said before (it wouldn't surprise me if you were involved under another name). Aren't there better things to do? --Merbabu 13:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
You miss the point completely. There are contributors here - including with accounts - who insist that The Edge and Clayton should not be described as British yet the band must be described as Irish. So by this logic one should not refer to the nationality of an individual, but must do so for a group of individuals (without even going into the 50/50 issue). Let's hear your defence of that - politics masquerading as policy. I'm happy for U2 to be constantly and forevermore referred to as "Irish group U2" (where it is actually relevant) if others will allow two men born in Britain, with UK passports and no dual nationality to be referred to specifically as British (dirty word for some of you, I know) in their biographical entries. Can't have it both ways. Just remember who is the one asking for consistency here. 195.92.40.49 14:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Firstly, it’s been implied a few times now that this some sort of political game. Being neither Irish or British, personally, I really couldn’t care less, I just want to see hard non-debatable facts, rather than commentary on which country can claim him - and I suggest that this is the case for most editors. Is the pushing of the term “British” over “Irish” anymore political? Dropping both terms and sticking to the facts is what I suggest. Also, I suggest people immediately stop insisting they know more about other editors’ own motivations and start assuming good faith.
As for the actual topic at hand, to get the most accurate statements, the questions of nationality of a person, and the “nationality” of a band must be separated, even if that person is a member of the band. Your claim that is inconsistency is irrelevant, actually even to be expected. ie, one doesn’t judge oranges and apples in the same way. Sure, bricks make up a house and have an influence on the nature of the house, but one judges brick’s and a house separately and by different criteria. Thus:
  • The Band as a singular entity: formed in Ireland, remains based in Ireland, as does is its management, is described by the members of the band themselves as a Irish band.
  • Edge. I think people are disagreeing on notions of nationality and identity. There is the official but often meaningless notion of what one’s passport says (unless you are at the immigration counter in the airport). Then there is the more significant notion of one’s identity. For most people, what is in their passport and their identity is the same thing. He spent 1 year (which I doubt he remembers) living in the UK, not of his own choosing. Has since lived 44 out of his 45 years in Ireland – which experience do you think has shaped him more? He’s spent 25 years (or more) at an age when he can choose where he wants to live – it’s Ireland. His family live there including children, he conducts his live largely from Ireland. Apart from U2-related activity, how much time does he spend in the UK? If, hypothetically, he walked into whatever govt department he needs to, and changes his citizenship and passport to Irish, has anything actually changed for him, apart from the colour of his passport? He is still the same person. What is written on a piece of paper, is not as significant to these characteristics of his identity.
Despite all that, I am not proposing that the article states he is Irish (even though it would be a better choice than he is British if one had to be chosen). I simply think that the article should list the facts (birth place, chosen place of residence, etc) as the article currently does, rather than try and "claim" him as one or the other.--Merbabu 01:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Re your second tiret, I find it astounding that you place your own uninformed and speculative opinions of a stranger's feelings above concrete facts such as place of birth; lineage; heritage; citizenship. You are editing on the basis of your assumptions. I could easily argue that his (and Clayton's) not giving up their UK passport and citizenship is an indication that they are proud to be, and wish to remain, British! Yes, you make reasonable points in general about notions of nationality and identity, but in this specific case unless these points are based on your knowledge of The Edge's personal beliefs then you are basing an encyclopeadic biographical entry on pure guesswork, and nothing more. Doesn't that bode well for accuracy.... 86.17.246.29 12:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
PS My stepfather was born in Dublin to Irish parents. He was brought up in Britain from the age of 11. He served in the Royal Navy, fought in the Falklands, then worked for Royal Mail for 20 years. He is a member of the British Legion. Guess what ? He says he is Irish, 100%. Are you going to tell him "NO! You are BRITISH!". Who are you to tell him he is wrong and abandon where and what he comes from simply because he resides elsewhere? This isn't France.... 86.17.246.29 12:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
What is a tiret? is it similar to a tirade? I think yours is more a tirade with all your exclamation marks - mine was long but calm. Your stepfather's example if anything only proves my point. Ie, you correctly point out that it is up to the person. All of this is still entirely irrelevant because what is in the article is undisputable (ie, born in UK, raised in Ireland, has UK passport). All disputed info is based on our assumptions and interpretations (ie, like your stepfather's example) as been removed from the article, so i really don't know what your problem is. To say is either Irish or British needs more than what his passport says and to say either is based on assumption. So unless anyone can find WP:RS that categorically says he identifies as being ether British or Irish then i suggest issue is closed. Article correctly states undisputable facts only. thanks --Merbabu 01:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Howick Falls

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, puerile edits, such as those you made to Howick Falls, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing. Please consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Beve 13:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] To whomever knows about the School Board for London

I've examined official papers produced by the Board and by the government setting it up and come across both 'London School Board' and 'School Board for London' being referred to as its official name. Is there a definitive answer? Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 16:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to RBX, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. codetiger 10:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Leeds, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 18:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manchester

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Manchester. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mr Stephen 16:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] UK taxpayers paying for Wiki editing

You spend an awful lot of time on Wikipedia instead of earning your wages. As a UK taxpayer this bothers me. You know what I'm talking about. Get back to work before I complain to your employer. 86.17.247.135 17:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

For anyone confused, see here and use your brain from there. Matthew 19:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More nonsense

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to British Fifty Pence coin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Arwel (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Manchester

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Manchester, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

For this contribution, and the warnings you have received above, I intend to move to have you blocked for a (possibly indefiniate) period of time. Jhamez84 22:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Tomato

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee 18:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Entropy

Thank you for experimenting with the page Entropy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Bduke 11:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Swinton and Pendlebury

Hi, this IP address appears to be shared by lots of users. I would welcome any of you to create your own personal account by clicking the "sign-in" link at the top right and follow the instructions (you get better editing features and your own space to edit).

I would welcome the contributor to the Swinton and Pendlebury articles particularly to create an account, as these contributions have prooved to be excellent. Hope that helps, Jhamez84 11:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

You have made an edit to Sebastián Leto that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. See the blocking policy.- Gilliam (talk) 15:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your Edit to Download Festival

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 20, 2007

Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick 12:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

The article's history shows support. John Reaves (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

The history is just as valid of a place to show support as Incidents page. Before you start arguing you point, how is it exactly that you came across this article and decided to look at the history and the surrounding arguments? In my experience, anonymous IP don't usually peruse histories and diffs and know about policy. John Reaves (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
You've yet to argue for the change. My "compromise" was reverted by myself back to the anoymous IPs version. Frankly, your opinion of me makes no difference to the argument (or "wouldn't", rather, seeing as you have no argument), nor does it matter to me. You could avoid this "two IP" issue by creating an account because, as of know, you don't have a very respectable history. John Reaves (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Apparently you haven't see your own history. There's no reason to lie and make things up about my history, so go ahead and stop. As far "wikirules" go, perhaps you should read WP:SOCK because you are a sockpuppet of 86.17.247.135. John Reaves (talk) 16:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits at User talk:John Reaves

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Regards, Navou banter 13:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prohibitions In Sikhism

Please stop editing the article and dekleting verifiable sources. Thanks--Sikh-history 13:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Stop trolling everyone knows this is you SIKH-HISTORY = 62.25.106.209--Sikh 1 15:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SAME USER = SIKH-HISTORY = 62.25.106.209

SAME USER = SIKH-HISTORY = 62.25.106.209--Sikh 1 15:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paolo_Maldin

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

[edit] March 2007

The section on the darts team of Cartmel College has been removed, again. It does not belong in an encyclopaedia. Please rethink and read Wikipedia policies such as Notability, no original research and neutral point of view before contributing in future. Failure to stick to these policies could end up with this IP address being blocked. Thank you. Bencherlite 21:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Devon Aoki. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. C777 10:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Richard and Judy

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Richard and Judy, you will be blocked from editing.

Ninja! 12:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Salma Hayek, you will be blocked from editing. Ronbo76 13:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Craig Harrison. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 09:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. janejellyroll 09:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Arctic roll

Hello, I've removed your three edits to articles about arctic roll. When contributing to Wikipedia, please be sure to keep a neutral point of view, and do not write about your own opinions. Also, when making claims such as you did in Ashes to Ashes (song), please cite the source of your information. Thanks. ×Meegs 21:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Adrian Littlejohn (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Alan Smith. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway 11:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Sutton Grammar School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JSpung 12:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sutton Grammar School, you will be blocked from editing. JSpung 12:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


[edit] June 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Telefónica O2. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Waggers 14:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Sheffield Steelers

Changed your edit to Sheffield Steelers which claimed they were the most successful team as this is open to conjecture--JD554 08:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 18:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Chiefrocka (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 18:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Criticisms of Star Trek. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ridernyc 12:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


discuss it on the talk page do not just edit out large sections of articles because you disagree with them.

copying this here this also on my talk page. Really register for an account if you want to edit. Talking acrossed multiple IPs is very conter productiveRidernyc 12:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I will reply to you hear since you are changing IP's constantly. You removed large portions of the page. Your stated reason was dubious at best, beyond that you removed sectiona that had nothing to do with your stated reason. You stated you weree removing information from one source that you diagreed with but you deleted multiple source and citations. Also if you are going to be doing major edits you really should create an account. Your edit really should have been discussed on the articles talk page Ridernyc 12:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grim Reaper (band), you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 15:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Celtic F.C., you will be blocked from editing. ~Matticus TC 14:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Mirfield Free Grammar. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fearne Cotton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ShoesssS Talk 15:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Women's international rugby, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. — Rlest 12:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Matthew Taylor (footballer) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 15:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] August 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peanut, you will be blocked from editing. — Mini-Geek (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Emre Belözoğlu, you will be blocked from editing. Rise Above the Vile 15:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Kirsten Costas:

Your recent edit to Kirsten Costas (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 11:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kirsten Costas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Krawi (de) talk 11:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Georgia

Sorry, a lot of other things happening. I've drawn the distinction between rank & score in the index. Your patience has been appreciated. Best, El_C 13:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

And once again, well done. El_C 13:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Robathan

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Lurker (said · done) 12:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Legality of the Iraq War. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. JCO312 13:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chocobo's Dungeon: Toki-Wasure no Meikyuu, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chocobo's Dungeon: Toki-Wasure no Meikyuu was changed by 62.25.106.209 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-16T16:56:12+00:00 . Thank you. -- ClueBot (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

- Philippe | Talk 21:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Bill Apter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks BJTalk 14:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Senegal national football team, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 15:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Barra, you will be blocked from editing. Lurker (said · done) 14:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfC

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Reggie Gross was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! MSGJ (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Angel. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lradrama 18:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Chris Byrne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 14:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Christopher Byrne. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christopher Byrne was changed by 62.25.106.209 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-07T14:46:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hugh Laurie, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hugh Laurie was changed by 62.25.106.209 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-07T14:55:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peter Parker. Sam Korn (smoddy) 14:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Waggers (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Resonance FM do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.   Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bwordpress\.com' (link(s): http://glassshrimp.wordpress.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] April 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to GLASSsHRIMP. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bwordpress\.com' (link(s): http://www.glassshrimp.wordpress.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sheffield United F.C., you will be blocked from editing. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Milton Keynes. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nate1481(t/c) 15:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Postmodernism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 11:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of the 100 wealthiest people. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deor (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of the 100 wealthiest people. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Closedmouth (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)