User talk:62.237.141.28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Hyper-Calvinism

Please see talk page. Thanks...KHM03 23:29, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Total depravity

Please take the debate to the talk page. I revised your original edits to be more concise, more neutral, and more relevant to the subject at hand. (May I also suggest you create a Wikipedia account? Anonymous users have less credibility with the Wikipedia community and are more likely to have their contributions deleted.) --Flex 17:06, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Ditto with Original sin. KHM03 19:08, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Existence of God

Hey, can you explain or restate the maths equation? It's not understandable to most readers at the moment, and this would not be beneficial, instead confusing them.

[edit] Appeal to contempt

Hi. I've nominated this article for deletion; it appears to be a neologism and in violation of WP:NOR. If you could contribute your thoughts at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appeal to contempt that would be helpful. Christopher Parham (talk) 22:13, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Capital punishment

Please see the talk page for this article and discuss before re-inserting historical data on pagans again - thanks! KillerChihuahua 18:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Nlu (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to History of cats. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adambiswanger1 19:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of transgendered people, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ^demon[yell at me][ubx_war_sux] /16:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 16:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Transsexualism

Thank you for your contributions to transsexualism. Some of your contributions have been highly constructive and I do not mean to discourage you from continuing to edit this article.

However, some of your edits to this article have been less than spectacular and I would like to give you a few hints.

  • Consensus on Wikipedia is that transsexual people should be referred to as "transsexual people", not as "transsexuals".
  • You should always write articles from a Neutral Point of View. If you have not familiarized yourself with this policy, I strongly recommend that you do so, and that you follow it. Some of your edits to the article on transsexualism have not been completely neutral. For one thing, you should almost never use words like "fortunately" and "unfortunately" in Wikipedia articles.
  • For information to be included in Wikipedia, it needs to be encyclopedic. See Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. In my opinion, the phrase "if you weren't a transsexual before surgery, than you will be after" is not very encyclopedic.

If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or on the article talk page.

Andrea Parton 19:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi again! I know many people in and around the transsexual community who prefer the term "transgender." I refer to myself as a transsexual person and a transgender person almost interchangeably. However, because "transgender" is an umbrella term and the article on Transsexualism focuses on only one segment of the TG spectrum, I think the article is appropriately named and I have tried very hard to establish consensus on the issue.

If you would like to continue making constructive edits to the article, please do so! Another point that I did not mention in my last post is citing sources. Content on Wikipedia must be verifiable, and citing sources is the only way to ensure it is such. Citing sources also allows readers of Wikipedia articles to do further reading on a topic if they wish to do so.

Andrea Parton 22:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Omega-3

Please read the talk page regarding snake oil.

[edit] Reference for tank ace Lauri Heino

Thanks for adding some information about Lauri Heino to the article about the T-34 tank. I've since started a stub article about him.

I've nominated the T-34 article for Featured Article status, and that requires all the more obscure facts to be sourced. Can you supply any reference sources for Heino being the first to capture the tank, and for the Finnish name sotka for the tank? English-language books or web sites would be best, but Finnish-language sources are acceptable too (a quick Google search ).

Thanks. —Michael Z. 2006-07-06 22:07 Z

Thanks for the response. For the benefit of other editors, I've consolidated the discussion at Talk:Lauri Heino#T-34 tank in Finnish use, and responded further there. —Michael Z. 2006-07-07 20:57 Z

[edit] Witch hunts in Finland as late as 1776?

Hi. In 31 July aside of your otherwise reasonable, if not entirely accurate edit to Witch-hunt you added a claim that "The last person accused from witchcraft in Finland was a man named Antti Lieroinen, who was executed from witchcraft-related murder in 1776." which is patent nonsense, as he was actually executed in 1643 and certainly wasn't the last one either accused or executed. The last executions appear to have taken place in 1690s, after which there still were a lot of accusations for witchcraft but they didn't lead anywhere. So where did the year 1776 come from? --82.197.22.37 00:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Finnish Units

I've been editing the Finnish weights and measures page you started to match the other such pages on historic units, but the page appears to lack cites. The one reference listed is out of date and draws a 404 message. Can you give us some alternate references we can use? Rhialto 02:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)