User talk:62.237.141.27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please source your statements. Wandalstouring 01:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] recent edits

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on sourcing, original research, and weasel words before contributing more material of the kind you added to the article on deconstruction. You can't just dress up personal opinions under the guise of "some say..." and expect it to improve an encyclopedia article. -- Rbellin|Talk 18:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Point Break, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 22:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Point Break, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 22:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Epistemology

Thank you for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. Thank you.Anarchia 21:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ming. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to various Medieval armour talk pages

Hello,

1) Your use of "bullshit" is simply unnecessary. You can be respectful and people will listen. 2) It is important to understand the limitations of SCA in learning about historical combat. Without a doubt the SCA is useful and productive, but it is not only valuable source. In fact it is not a proper source from an academic standpoint. If the history and your SCA experiences are contradictory the history is right. 3) Please register and sign your work. Mercutio.Wilder (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

You should remember that you cannot delete information from Wikipedia. Blanking your talk page does not get rid of what myself and other editors have put here. It only demonstrates bad faith by trying to conceal your actions.


Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

This is for your edit to Ailette

I appreciate more of your edits than those to which I object. However, you still need to work appropriately within the framework of Wikipedia if you wish to continue. I'll repeat a previous comment here:

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Thanks for your interest Mercutio.Wilder (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)