User talk:60.42.252.205

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I performed some mainly copyedits [1] on the contentious Comfort Women page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.

Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteric warning threats [2] and revisions from a Pro-Korean editor Caspian_blue [3]. The article was then identically reverted by another editor. I continued to develop the article.

I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page [4] ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later [5].

Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. [6]

What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

3RR on Comfort women. EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Let us be honest and clear ... this is a knowingly contrived situation designed to maintain control of an article ... Indeed, one I predicted the account Caspian blue would attempt on his talk page and above at top. --- *All three editor performed the identical and total deletion of all of the work I am doing on the article. --- * All three removed entirely neutral copyedits. --- * None engaged in any discussion --- * None had previous sought to address the tags at the top of the article. --- * I do not challenge any of the claims on the article nor have I ever suggested that Korean women were signing up in droves so, please, get real. --- * I have attempted discuss with all parties and on the topic page. --- * And it is entirely accurate to represent, as I have done, that there was an existing sex industry in Korea prior to, during, and after the Japanese invasion (indeed, it expanded considerable during the American invasion). If war is anything, it is crime by men against women regardless of race or nationality. I am not Asian, putting this topic into shape is going to require an impartial hand. ---* The intention behind Caspian's assault is far too transparent (he even presents the attempt to continue a discussion on his talk page as a 3RR!) and the protagonists have immediately reverted all edits. ---* Lastly, if you look at the diffs, I was actually continuing to develop topic and being the one subject to identical revisions. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Please see the section for edit warring under User:The Evil Spartan/unblock. You were blocked for violation of the WP:3RR, past a warning, not for the content of your editions. If you are unable to recognize the problem with edit warring, then I do not see any reason we should unblock you. — The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.