User talk:59.167.73.44

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You wrote to me: "Dean McVeigh I have replaced the need for citation on the McVeigh story as the reference appears below. Is there another way of presenting it that is better?" Please note the source you cited does not meet Wikipedia's policy for reliable sources as discussed on the article's talk page.--A Y Arktos 21:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xtra 12:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

It is not defamatory. It is fully referenced. Xtra 12:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

What particularly do you find to be defamous and why? Xtra 12:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

You have not told me anything that would constitute defamation. And defamous is the adjective of defamation (for further reference see my grammer userbox on my userpage). However, if you claim to be defamed in the article, you could put a {{libel}} tag on it, but then you would have to identify yourself. BTW I know more about MUSU than you think. Xtra 13:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

That scan did not impart any relevant information. Xtra 02:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)