User talk:59.167.45.168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is the massive PROD'ing really necessary? I know you're allowed to, so don't quote policy at me, but is it really productive? —αlεx•mullεr 12:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, and the same applies to templates as well. Please consider that several templates overlap each other in scope, meaning that if you choose one, you may not need another one as it is already covered by the first. In such cases, the excessive use of templates merely clutters the page, and can actually discourage cleanup. (FYI, your efforts would be better received if you were to engage in discussion of the matter first, instead of just nominating for deletion or adding numerous templates. Please consider registering an account and discussing your concerns; if there is no satisfactory resolution, you still have the option of nominating for deletion.) --Ckatzchatspy 19:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I realise that The Bill character articles are unsourced and fair enough that you are choosing attempted deletion of them. But it would be a real shame to see them be deleted think of all the hard work people have put into them, its ok for you all you do is post deletion notices where the people who created them have worked hard and done some real editing Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 08:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recent Prods

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Gazimoff (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)