User talk:59.149.32.77

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (59.149.32.77) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Doug.(talk • contribs) 16:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -Jéské (v^_^v Detarder) 17:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Cardinal Conway, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I have decided to give you the benifit of the doubt and so this is now a general notice and no longer a warning. Thanks yettie0711 (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Picture sizing

Hello! I wanted to ask about picture sizing on various article. I notice you have made changes to several bishop articles, sizing them to 230px. In a few cases, such as the articles for Randolph Royall Claiborne, Jr. and Marc Handley Andrus, this size is larger than the actual image, and lowers the quality of the article. I have changed these back to display a size that does not distort the images. Is there a standard for setting infobox images to 230px? (I will do that if there is.) I do think that in cases where 230px is larger than the image, it should be left at default so it does not distort. Any thoughts? --AltioraPeto (talk) 21:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes. You are right. --59.149.32.77 (talk) 04:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary on edits you make. In viewing your edit history, this is consistently missing. Adding an edit summary is considered an important Wiki guideline, and helpful to other editors. Thanks! --AltioraPeto (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Quill/Electrobe

Oh, I remember him alright. It certainly looks like him, but it's your assumption. File a sockpuppet report and then send me the link so I back vouch your part of the discussion. Therequiembellishere (talk) 17:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)