User talk:59.144.161.143

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: Montgomery Burns. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mini-Geek (talk) 13:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


With regards to your comments on May Day: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Mini-Geek (talk) 13:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Wibbble 13:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Wibbble you are the vandal.

[edit] Wikipedia is not a how-to

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#HOWTO

The above link tells us that Wikipedia is not a place for how-to's.

If you want to write how-to's, I suggest you go to http://www.wikihow.com/Main-Page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mini-Geek (talk • contribs) 14:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC).


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Marc 11:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dear Mini-Geek , where is the problem if I include a link to some phone enhancements in the external links section. Wibbble insits on removing these too. I know what Wikipedia is and I know what external links are. I see no reason....

I think you're overreacting alot, and that Wibbble is overreacting a little. You keep putting in howtos and links to howtos. Wibbble is removing both of them. I don't agree with this. I think the howtos should be removed, but the links should stay. Wibbble is probably just reverting all the edits he sees you do related to howtos because of what you did, and the fact that you've been warned for one or another type of vandalism four times, which means you've got a last warning. In the end, I don't think either of you are doing right. — Mini-Geek (talk) 15:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Dear Mini-Geek I would urge you to look at the [Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule] and wibbble should not remove links from the external links section. He is just a spoil sport I guess. And if you go and look at the time line, wibbble kept undoing my edits and I did nothing for a long time. Then I had had enough.

[edit] Continuing Vandalism.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Wibbble 15:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HTC Wizard

Can you please stop just reverting my edit with no comment? If you continue to do this, I'll have to request admin intervention. I've done everything I can to encourage debate. If you disagree with my interpretation of the information - discuss it on the talk page. If you're unwilling to discuss it, don't revert the changes. The comment-less reversion and the petty retaliatory vandalism will not result in the article including the information you want it to - only consensus reached through discussion has any hope of that.

Please stop and think about what you're doing and the manner in which you're behaving. Wibbble 19:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If you do not like my edit then please let me know what you want me to change. Talk to me. If you undo my edit unanimously, then you are asking for similar treatment to your undo edits. --59.144.161.143 13:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I've raised this repeatedly on the talk page of the article! Please do not pretend that I've not made any effort to engage you in discussion on this. The section on the 'solution' to the screen alignment problem is original research and not appropriate for wikipedia anyway per WP:NOT. The 'free program from the Microsoft website' section is pointless - the handset can run a huge range of software from MS and others, and listing it all there isn't appropriate since it's not to do with that actual device.
I've done everything I can to try to get you to participate in discussion on this subject and you never have. At this point I'm not sure that I can assume good faith any more. Please do not re-add this material without explaining - on the article talk page, where other people can see it and contribute - why it's not OR and isn't covered by WP:NOT. Wibbble 18:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
If you stop undoing my edits and request me instead, maybe I will listen. A unanimous undo will result in a unanimous undo. Period. Why did you remove the link to the tweaks from the external link section. Do you own a HTC Wizard in the first place. Let people vote for what information they want here and what not. Don't you police around and stay in your cage. --59.144.161.143 07:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
The link has not been removed. Wikipedia is not a democracy. I've explained my position on the talk page, which you refuse to comment on. If you are not willing to respond to what I've said on the talk page, I don't think you have any intention of actually working to reach consensus. I'm going to see how to request admin intervention/arbitration on this issue as this edit-warring cannot just continue forever. Wibbble 12:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I have posted a Request for Comment on this dispute. You may wish to edit the section on the talk page to include your views on this dispute. Wibbble 12:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I feel the information I am posting is very relevant about HTC Wizard and see no reason why you should just undo my edit. If possible try to add to the knowledge base on Wikipedia rather than be a vandal. --59.144.161.143 11:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you will not discuss this on the article talk page? Wibbble 21:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you kindly read this article and then explain why you have had the audacity to call me a Vandal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_vandalism_is_not --59.144.161.143 15:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question. However, this is why you are a vandal: you have vandalised wikipedia, repeatedly. Editors other than myself have warned you for this. Here's some examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] Are you really going to argue that adding 'This is user:Wibbble and I am useless' to an article is not vandalism? Wibbble 21:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


Wibbble People like you don't fool me. Just look inside your heart and ask who started this. I am beyond this frivolity. --59.144.161.143 10:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Or, in other words, you don't have a response to what I said? All you have done is make increasingly wild accusations and added more and more information into the article that does not fit in with what wikipedia is not. I do not believe that you are acting in good faith any longer. Wibbble 19:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I have had this feeling about you from day one. --59.144.161.143 15:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Latest Revert

Can you please explain to me why you have started reverting - without meaningful comment - my changes again? Please note the BIG RED TEXT in the 'undo' display which says that you should change the edit summary unless it is vandalism. My edit - adding references and removing material which has been moved to talk subpages as per the talk page - was not vandalism. Are you intending to start mindless edit-warring again? I thought this issue had been resolved? Wibbble 12:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

I wish to request mediation on the issue of your edits to HTC Wizard. Mediation can only take place with the consent of all involved, so before I do this I need to know that you're willing to take part so that we can find a solution to allow the article to be edited and improved in a non-disruptive manner and to avoid further edit-warring. Please reply either here or on my talk page. Wibbble 20:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

As you have not responded, and mediation cannot take part without your consent, I have removed the content from HTC Wizard again. If you re-add it I will request arbitration so that we can get this resolved once and for all. It's incredibly difficult to work on articles when people revert your edits without any commentary at all and refuse to enter into any kind of discussion. Wibbble 00:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

For God's sake, let the delete button on your keyboard take some rest. Improvement is welcome. Deletion is very very unwelcome. Period.--59.144.161.143 13:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

You are aware that you are deleting content when you do that revert, aren't you? Anyway, I'm going to request arbitration now, as you are unwilling to take part in mediation. Wibbble 22:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I have opened a request for arbitration now, you can find it here: [14]. Wibbble 22:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)