User talk:58.168.213.239

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] sorry for deleting

I tried to revert myself. —Whig (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

((helpme|Please bring back those comments! You are making me madder by not doing it! If you could just do it, we could all be happy. I would have those comments back, and you wouldn't have to deal with these silly DRVs!))

Please just do it! It's not that hard! I would definitely do it if I was an administrator! Can you really trust the most disliked Wikipedia administrator's actions? 58.168.213.239 (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ihatespartaz". The reason given for Ihatespartaz's block is: "Blocked indefinitely, due to abuse. To appeal or request help, please Special:Emailuser. Also, I did not use that account. A friend of mine came over to my house, and I told him about my problem with you guys, so he created that account. I'm sorry for those actions and any inconvinience.

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page.

Since this IP seems to have been used consistently for abuse, I've blocked it directly. Will leave the unblock request up for another admin to review. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Request was restored by 124.180.24.193 (talk · contribs), who appears to be an IP used for block evasion, after it was previously reviewed; since I'm the blocking admin in both cases, I won't remove the request for now. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
The IP address was not used for block evasion, silly. It was used long after this IP address was used! So block evasion, na-ah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.209.38 (talk) 09:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Why isn't it anon-only?"

Decline reason: "I concur with Luna Santin -- it's not a good idea to make this block anon-only, as the IP is clearly static, and the block is temporary. Mangojuicetalk 15:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Why would it be? – Luna Santin (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)