User talk:58.168.128.66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 58.168.128.66, is registered to Telstra Internet. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Telstra Internet to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Telstra Internet, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

[edit] April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:Georgia guy, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 11:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 11:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I only attacked that user's talk page because of a comment they wrote idiotically."

Decline reason: "Read WP:CIVIL / WP:NPA and follow them, or you won't be around here much longer. — Sandstein (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I just made some GOOD edits."

Decline reason: "When your block expires, you are welcome to make good edits to the encyclopedia. Please wait patiently until then. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I have removed the faked unblock reviewed (2nd chance) and unblock granted notices placed here by this user and extended their block by another 48 hours for attempting to game the system in this manner. Gwernol 11:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

1. The 2nd chance template is for showing that you can edit constructively. 2. Personal attacks? Apart from that one at Georgia Guy's talk page, who else did I attack? 3. I'm going on a holiday in 2 days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.128.66 (talk • contribs)

You have an unblock notice in place, there is no need to add a second one. To your points: the 2nd chance template is for other users to give to you, not for you to give yourself, especially not if you fake an unblock reviewed notice to make it appear that another admin has agreed to unblock you if you make reasonable edits. No admin has made any such offer to you. The fact that you also placed a faked "unblock granted" notice on this page and signed it from another user is completely unacceptable, and makes it clear you are trying to game the system.
The personal attack I referred to are the series of personal attacks you made to {[User:Georgia Guy]] and others. These are completely unacceptable.
Your holiday plans are irrelevant to whether you should be unblocked or not. Gwernol
I've removed the full text of an article from this talk page, since it doesn't seem to be relevant, but anyone who wants to see it can look in the history. As no one offered a 'second chance' template, it didn't seem helpful to me, and made it hard to read the talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)