Talk:53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Could someone please move the World War One history to another article, to make room for a new article on the 2nd World War 53rd Welsh Division? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomdidiot (talk • contribs) 17:12 UTC, May 28, 2006 (UTC)
- This article, though only addressing World War I, can be expanded to include the World War II information. No need for a second article. —ERcheck @ 22:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've added a places within the article for WW2 info. Please expand with information that you have on WW2. —ERcheck @ 22:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division (United Kingdom) → 53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division — United Kingdom as disambigutor unnecessary —GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support as per Graeme Leggett. Buckshot06(prof) 09:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support per Graeme; after having reviewed the WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME, there's no need for the disambiguator. Parsecboy (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Any additional comments:GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
From my understanding, WP:MILHIST naming conventions always include the country, even in cases like 517th Parachute Infantry Regiment (United States) and 101st Airborne Division (United States) where no such disambiguator is needed. However, I don't particularly see the use for it myself. Parsecboy (talk) 19:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- They do not. Clearly understood that when it's a unique title, no disambiguation is necessary. Buckshot06(prof) 09:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.