Talk:50,000,000 Elvis Fans Can't Be Wrong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of the Elvis Presley WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in systematically organizing all the information in Wikipedia related to the "The King of Rock 'n' Roll". This project's focus is to centralize the efforts of many Wikipedians to make Wikipedia the best free resource when it comes to information about the subject.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)


The article needs to be supported by more references, preferably using the inline citation templates. The JPStalk to me 09:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] title meanings page

I added a rejoinder to the title meanings section, previously called alternate meanings, stating that the modern usage of the album's title as a term of derision has no relation to how that title was initially used and received. I'm not sure that this section even belongs on the page, but I did not want to remove someone else's work.PJtP 19:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly the most bizarre wikipedia edit ever:

"Its evolution of the phrase into a snowclone - as expressed in the Simpsons pastiche "Fifty million smokers can't be wrong," for example - ironically ridicules argumentum ad populum, the misconception that popularity or consensus equals validity. This postmodern interpretation, however, has no bearing on how the title was received by Elvis fans in the 1950s and early 1960s, or on the intent of the phrase as used by RCA to market the album." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.240.106.182 (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)