User talk:4pario

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Pario

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Pario, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Bongwarrior 08:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Pario

Pario, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pario satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pario and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Pario during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bongwarrior 09:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• The result of the debate and discussion was to delete the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pario. Sorry for this, but the article - as written - violated so many policies that my decision was necessary. If you disagree, you may appeal the debate and decision by the process as outlined at the blue link. Bearian 19:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)